I think it might be (past) time to retire that banal "10/10 no notes" meme now.

It's like, you wrote a paragraph or two about the thing, then at the end, you add "10 out of 10, no notes." Then what the fuck was that paragraph or two you just wrote, if not "notes" about the thing? Sure, they may have been positive notes, but they were still fucking notes.

That is all.

"Maud's Story - Tales Unwritten | Origins"

Watch on YouTube

Uncover the backstory of Maud! Where did she come from? Where did she go? Did she get eaten by a giant toad? All that and more!

Featuring:
Jesse Nowack as Maud
Stephan Krosecz as Everybody Else

---

This is Jesse's session 0 as Maud. Not sure where the name "Maud" actually comes from, though, since the character was called "Mittens" for the entirety of this one, even in a narrative way by the player and DM. I'm guessing that is a question that will probably be asked and possibly even answered when they post the discussion video for this later.

This one is almost the opposite of Karna's in terms of tone. Whereas Karna's started very light and remained so for most of it, then got a lot darker toward the end, Maud's story started pretty dark (after a bit of fluff at the very start) and remained so for most of it, then ended on a (relatively) lighter note.

I hope Skitterkit appears again at some point. Rufflepaw, on the other hand, can die slowly in a fire, for all I care. Although that would possibly traumatize Maud/Mittens if it happened and she found out about it (or saw it happen).

(EDIT) And here is the discussion video for the above. (/EDIT)