kane_magus: (Default)
A post on John Scalzi's website.

"It's 2026 and this special flavor of gilded age we live in at the moment means that what qualifies as 'selling out' has an extremely high bar. Making a living was very rarely 'selling out' in any era. I think these days the phrase should be mostly reserved for writing things you absolutely don't believe, for the sort of people you would in fact despise, with the result of your work is you making the world worse for everyone. Avoid doing that, please.

"Short of that, get paid, have those experiences and develop new tools. All of it will be useful for the art you do care about. That’s not selling out. That’s learning, with compensation."
kane_magus: (Default)

Oh shit, the Pope's gonna get eaten by Roko's basilisk!

Seriously, though, the Pope isn't wrong, at least in this one specific instance.
kane_magus: (Default)
"Today in 'Things that "AI" has ruined':"

A post, on John Scalzi's Whatever.

"If you're a scammer who uses 'AI' to try to defraud actual humans, please die in a fucking fire, thanks. For everyone else, sorry a flood of spam has ruined book clubs. It's awful for every one of us."
kane_magus: (Default)
I'm not posting this to join the lamentation about the shut down of "Myrient," because I'd never even heard of "Myrient" prior to reading this article, and its shutdown does not affect me personally.

I'm also not necessarily posting this to say that while I disagree with roughly 99.9999% of the holier-than-thou whinging of that "GodlessPreservation" assclown down in the comments about how "objectively theft" and "morally wrong" roms sites are, I do agree that calling a rom site a "preservation service" is, at best, highly disingenuous.

I'm not even posting this to say that, yeah, the AI bubble is indeed a big reason why computer parts cost an arm and a leg now (when they only cost maybe an arm or a leg before), i.e. one of many reasons why the AI bubble needs to burst ASAP.

No, I am primarily posting this because it contains a proper, legitimate, and correct usage of the phrase "out of pocket." Increasingly rare, that.
kane_magus: (Default)
In this dispute, on the one side, is an AI company, which, simply by virtue of being an AI company, is inherently, intrinsically, and innately scummy, as could be observed by anyone following all this crap for the past few years.

And yet, in this confrontation, the AI company is the fucking good guy hero in comparison to the other side, on which we have the true epitome of putrid scumbaggery: the Donald Trump """"""""""administration.""""""""""

That's the state of the world we live in right now.

(EDIT)

Follow up article: "Trump orders federal agencies to stop using Anthropic technology in dispute over AI safety"

Of particular disgust: "The move is likely to benefit Elon Musk's competing chatbot, Grok, which the Pentagon plans to give access to classified military networks, and could serve as a warning to two other competitors, Google and OpenAI, that also have contracts to supply their AI tools to the military."

The fucking last thing we need is fucking Grok, of all fucking gen-AIs, being given "access to classified military networks." Imagine if Skynet wasn't just a stereotypical genocidal "evil AI" but was also a racist, neo-Nazi piece of shit on top of that. That's Grok. Do we really want Elon Musk and his gen-AI Mini-Me to have "access to classified military networks"? I mean, no, we don't, not any more than we'd want any of these other AI bros in charge of them, but if we had to give an AI bro "access to classified military networks," Phony Stark is probably by far the worst choice of all. I mean, just look at how much shit Elron Mustard managed to fuck up when he was "merely" the head of DOGE. Oh, and what happens if Sissy SpaceX and Dumbshit Jackass get into another pissing contest again? Something to ponder.

(/EDIT)
kane_magus: (Default)
Full headline, for the usual reasons: "Night in the Woods publisher Finji accuses TikTok of creating 'racist, sexist' and uneditable GenAI ads for its games"

"Finji is 'unable to view or edit the AI-generated versions of its own ads,' which includes a 'sexualised, racist and sexist representation' of one of its characters"



"'I have to admit I am a bit shocked by TikTok's complete lack of appropriate response to the mess they made,' [Finji CEO and co-founder, Rebekah] Saltsman told [IGN].

"'It's one thing to have an algorithm that's racist and sexist, and another thing to use AI to churn content of your paying business partners, and another thing to do it against their consent, and then to also NOT respond to any of those mistakes in a coherent way? Really?'

"'What really is utterly baffling is what appears to be a profound void where common sense and business sense usually reside,' she continued.

"'Does TikTok want me to be grateful for the mistreatment of my company and our game? Based on the wild response through the weeks of customer service correspondence we have received, I think this is their stance and take on their obvious offensive and racist technology and process and how they secretly use it on the assets of their paying clients without consent or knowledge.'

"Saltsman added: 'This is just simply embarrassing, but not for me as an individual. For me, I am just super pissed off. This is my work, my team's work and mine and my company's reputation, which I have spent over a decade building. My expectation was a proper apology, systemic changes in how they use this technology for paying clients and a hard look at why their technology is so obviously racist and sexist. I am obviously not holding my breath for any of the above.'"




So, yeah... I guess that's the freshest hell involving gen AI being unleashed by uncaring asshats for nefarious purposes.

The game in question is Usual June (a game I have not yet played myself). While I haven't seen these racist/sexist ads (nor am I going to seek them out, because TikTok), I can, sadly, easily imagine how disgusting they probably are.

Well, on the "bright" side, TikTok is US-owned now, so maybe Finji can sue the shit out of TikTok and, hopefully, get at least marginally better results than if it was still wholly owned by China. Or maybe not, I dunno. *vague gesture in the direction of the current US "justice" system + shrug + weary sigh*

(EDIT) So... as someone who does not and will not ever use TikTok, I've just got to ask... is this shit normal? (Note, only one of those was AI generated, as far as I'm aware. The rest were made by humans. WTAF.) (/EDIT)
kane_magus: (Default)
Full headline, because barely even half of that shit fit in Dreamwidth's subject field: "'Pulp Fiction' Writer Says It Was 'Impossible' to Get His Movies Made Until He Started an AI Production Company: 'Just Put AI in Front of It and All of a Sudden You're in Production on Three Features'"

*weary goddamn motherfucking sigh + facepalm + smdh*

So, note to self (and hopefully note to anyone else reading this): avoid any new movies that involve Roger Avary in any way from now on, I guess. (Besides, even ignoring the AI dumbshit, anyone in 2026 CE who willingly appears as a guest on "The Joe Rogan Experience" deserves to be shunned, just for that alone.)

Of course, given that the three so-called """""features""""" in question here are "'a family Christmas movie that'll be in theaters this holiday season,' a 'faith-based movie for next Easter' and a 'big romantic war epic,'" I think I would've been quite safe from ever seeing any of these, even if I hadn't known they were made with AI.

What's more insidious, of course, are all the other """""movies""""" that are most assuredly being made like this, except by slightly smarter scumbags who don't proudly boast about doing it beforehand.
kane_magus: (Default)
A post on John Scalzi's Whatever blog.

Actually 11 thoughts, because he adds one more in the first comment. That one might even be the most important one, really.
kane_magus: (Default)

Is there any way to speed it up, though? It's happening too slowly, as far as I'm concerned.

Wow, they even somehow managed to tie Jeffrey Epstein directly into modern video game industry bullshit.

Here is a Google search for "Epstein Kotick" for what it's worth. I don't plan to do very much digging here. I already knew Bobby Kotick was evil. I don't really need further confirmation of that long ago established fact.
kane_magus: (Default)
On the one hand, I'm glad people are still bringing horseshit like this to light. The moment people give up on trying to do that is the moment the Trump """""administration""""" finally wins, and that would be terrible. Well, I mean, even more terrible than everything already is, anyway.

On the other hand, for me personally, it's like... "So, the Trump '''''administration''''' was caught in yet another blatant lie, you say? Well, I guess it must be a day that ends in '-day' then. *eye roll*"

I mean, this isn't even the first time that they've used AI-doctored bullshit in their favor. With that said, this might be the first time they've actively and obviously directly done it themselves, rather than just reposting something "made" by some other dipshit on social media or whatever, though? Or, at least, the first time they've been caught red-handed doing it? I wouldn't bet money on that being the case, though. (On them having never done it before, to be clear.)
kane_magus: (Default)

"This is a weird and difficult topic. Curious to hear your thoughts."



When Charles Cornell was talking about the AI-generated playlists in restaurants, I couldn't help but think about when I walk around in Food Lion, because the only time I ever notice the music at all is when they're playing a song I've heard before, be it Michael Jackson or New Kids on the Block or the Bangles or whatever other 80s/90s stuff they typically play in there. If Food Lion started playing AI-slop, I'd probably stop noticing it altogether, unless it was something exceptionally bad/stupid.

Anyway, if the day comes where Youtube serves only AI-generated videos, that will be the day I never use Youtube again.[1]

(EDIT) Oh, and he makes that same fatuous comparison between humans taking inspiration from others and AI just straight up being trained on stolen material and how it's "what we all do" (even though I don't think he actually really believes it, even as he's saying it). AI is not "taking inspiration" from what is fed into them. They're just using what's fed into them and spitting it back out again. Same as with "art" and "writing," AI "music" is just the generative AI spewing out what is the most likely expected thing, based on whatever prompt it has been given. (/EDIT) (EDIT 2) This comment under the above video is a pretty good rebuttal to the notion that AI theft is "just inspiration." (/EDIT 2)

And as far as people wanting or not wanting to go see a live "AI music" concernt... like... people have been going to fucking vocaloid live concerts for at least a decade now. People pay cash money to go see Hatsune Miku projected onto a screen, "singing" whatever. Hell, that shit was on the fucking Late Show with David Letterman over a decade ago. ("It's like being on Willie Nelson's bus.") But even for vocaloid stuff, that was still ostensibly created by humans... at least for now. Oh wait, no, never mind, vocaloid stuff is already being AI-generated, too. Herp derp.

Man, I will be so, so glad when this fucking AI bubble bursts. That said, Charles Cornell is probably not wrong, here. As much as some people (like me) complain about it, most people really just don't give a shit at all, one way or the other.

[1] - Hell, I'm almost to that point already, just based on all the other stupid bullshit Youtube has been doing lately. It has already been over two years since the last time I ever actually logged in to my own Youtube account, for example, and if they ever remove the ability to watch videos without being logged in, that will be the day I kick them to the curb forever. (Or else find yet another workaround that allows me to continue sticking it to The Man™. *eye roll*)
kane_magus: (Default)
...instead of just continuing to use the "fuck epic games store" tag as the de facto "tim sweeny says stupid things" tag.

"As Grok continues generating sexualised images, Epic Games boss says senators calling for a ban are trying to 'censor all of their political opponents'"
kane_magus: (Default)
When I say "I want the AI bubble to burst," I'm not even saying I want all the generative AIs/LLMs to go away. It's mainly that I just want all the slimy AI bros to go away. AI shills say shit like "yeah well, when the dot com bubble burst, did the Internet go away? No. AI is here to stay so fuck you," or "you're a hypocrite if you ever criticize AI even a little while participating in societyusing the Internet. Ha ha gottem!" or "*sea lion noises*"

I don't necessarily want gen AI/LLMs gone when the bubble bursts, any more than I wanted dot coms gone when that bubble burst or wanted the entire concept of blockchain to disappear when the NFT bubble burst. I just want all the stupid, shitty, shilly, slimy, smarmy AI bros to go away, like how (most of) the dot com bros and NFT shills went away. I just want people to stop being so hyperbolically goddamned asinine about it.
kane_magus: (Default)
Three things about this.

First, it's like, well, a heartily sarcastic "congratulations" to Larian for (seemingly) claiming to take a stance that should be the absolute baseline bare-minimum standard that all decent video game companies should take (though it's long been pretty obvious that maybe "decent" "video game company" is an oxymoron). They don't deserve praise for "committing" to doing what they should have been doing all along, from the start.

Second, what a bunch of typical corporate doublespeak, trying to turn it back around on their critics. "I can see where the confusion comes from. Even though the words that explicitly came out of my mouth made it seem like we were doing the bad thing, we're actually not doing the bad thing, so I'm sorry that you were confused by the things I said previously. So, to clear up all this confusion, I am saying now that we're definitely not doing the bad thing that everyone was confused by my own words into thinking we were doing."

Third, except...

"'Having said that, we continuously try to improve the speed with which we can try things out. The more iterations we can do, the better in general the gameplay is,' he said.

"'We think generative AI can help with this and so we're trying things out across departments. Our hope is that it can aid us to refine ideas faster, leading to a more focused development cycle, less waste, and ultimately, a higher-quality game.'"


So, basically, everything he just tried to say about how they're actually not going to do the bad thing that everyone was so "confused" about them doing based on the words he'd said previously... was complete bullshit, and they are going to be doing the bad thing, anyway. "We're not going to do the bad thing that everyone hates for that one specific case that got us in trouble, but we are going to continue doing the bad thing in all the other cases. Apologies if you were confused by that."
kane_magus: (Default)
Went to the grocery store tonight and was planning to get a taco salad from Wendy's on the way home.

"Sorry, we don't have any salads at all tonight. We don't have the bowls for them."

So... I decided to go to Bojangles instead and just get a sausage, egg, and cheese biscuit. They have "AI" taking drive through orders there, now. Urrrrgh. So, after the AI tried to upsell me on shit I didn't want, both before and after I placed my order, I got to the window.

"Um, we only have sausage and cheese tonight. Will that be all right?"

Just to note, Bo-fucking-Linda didn't say word one about there being no egg available.

So... now I'm eating a sausage, egg, and cheese biscuit, sans egg. It's... not too bad, I guess. Not great, but not inedible. *shrug.* They did, at least, knock some off the price. And I think I got more sausage than I would've otherwise (though I'd have preferred egg to extra sausage). The thing I've got is two sausage patties with cheese between them, in a biscuit.

Silver lining, at least I'm having a better night than whoever warranted a firetruck, the little SUV that follows the firetruck, and an ambulance that went by, sirens blaring, while I was sitting in the Bojangles drive through.
kane_magus: (Default)
"That's when we learned the importance of correcting these AI-generated reports."

Wow, ya think?

Dear entire world, please stop trying to use LLMs/"gen AI" to do things that LLMs/"gen AI" are egregiously incapable of doing in any reasonably or even remotely accurate fashion.
kane_magus: (Default)

At this point, whenever some dumbshit video game company says they want to go all in (or even just a little bit in) on "generative AI"/LLMs, it has the same negative, braindead energy as when a lot of those same companies went all in on DRM and blockchain/NFT bullshit. Sure, DRM badware seems to be here to stay, unfortunately, but you don't hear too many game company honchos hyping blockchain or NFTs so much anymore. LLM/AI is just as tulip mania-ish as all that shit, though.
kane_magus: (Default)
I'm just linking to the blog, even if the comic associated with it (being part two of the previous comic, as implied by the title) is pretty cool so far.

Mainly, I just want to post this for Tycho's words about recent AI bullshit. And by that I mean I just want to copy and paste Tycho's words here, those relevant to the whole AI thing, anyway, because I mostly agree with them, without feeling a need to elaborate or anything. Besides, I've already posted about this shit.

(Links and italics are his [well, except that I inverted the italics below].)



Behind a cut, of course. )
kane_magus: (Default)
Full headline, because yadda yadda: "'Tasks that previously took 2-3 hours can now be completed in 10 minutes': Falcom is the latest developer to buy into the AI hype machine"

Yet another video game company for the shitpile, I guess. *weary sigh*

"We are using AI to brainstorm scenarios and do research." Huge red flag, right there. "AI is also used to correct typos in the scenario." Um, that's what fucking spellcheck (itself a form of rudimentary "AI," at least in the same sense that LLMs themselves are "AI," anyway) is for, you dim bulbs. You do not need to use a goddamned LLM for that.

Oh, and as for you, Eurogamer, it's "Ys" (pronounced like "geese," except without the "g") not "Y's" (and it's definitely not pronounced like "wise" or "why's"). Also, Eurogamer, having the sentence "It is worth noting that this is a rough translation from Japanese to English using Google's in-built browser tools, and therefore the intricacies of this statement could be off," is pretty damn odd, in an article calling out others for the use of LLM/AI, I've got to say.
kane_magus: (Default)
Full headline because, as usual, it wouldn't all fit up there: "Gamers Are Overwhelmingly Negative About Gen AI in Video Games, but Attitudes Vary by Gender, Age, and Gaming Motivations."

"We also found that older gamers are more favorable towards Gen AI while younger gamers are more negative. Among gamers age 13-17, only 3% have a positive (i.e., above neutral) attitude towards Gen AI. This is 7% among gamers age 18-24, and it rises to 22% among gamers age 45+."

Yeah, I must be an outlier, then, because I'm 46 (will be 47 in a little over a month [Jesus fucking Christ]), and I think that shit can go straight to hell. Then again, 22% is not all that high a percentage, so not really an outlier, after all, I guess. (Also, um, 9+9+3=21, not 22.)

At least the kids seem to know what's what, anyway. That's a good sign, I suppose. Encouraging.

Not that the people who shoehorn this unwanted dogshit into games gives a fat flying fuck what "gamers" want. *shrug*

Profile

kane_magus: (Default)
kane_magus

March 2026

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 56 7
89 1011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Page generated Mar. 13th, 2026 07:37 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios