Full headline, because Dreamwidth's subject field length is still inadequate: "Valve sued by The Performing Right Society for allegedly using its members' musical works 'without permission'"
IANAL, but let me see if I'm correctly understanding this here. These assclowns are suing Valve because...
...
...Valve sells video games via Steam that happen to have music in them? And they're saying that Valve doesn't have the rights to that music? I mean, they're not talking about games specifically made by Valve, since they mention shit like Forza Horizon and FIFA and Grand Theft Auto. They're saying that for any game sold on Steam that has music associated with The Performing Right Society in them, Valve must pay The Performing Right Society for the right to sell those games?
Does this seem like the stupidest dumbshit ever shat out of a dog's diseased asshole to anyone else?
So...
Are they going to be suing GOG and Epic Games Store and such, too?
Are they going to be suing Walmart, Target, Best Buy, GameStop, etc.? They also sell video games, after all.
Are they going to be suing Apple and Samsung for making smartphones capable of playing music? I mean, I've put video game soundtracks on my phone and listened to them in the car. Speaking of which...
Are they going to be suing Toyota and General Motors and Ford and the rest because they put sound systems in their cars that are capable of playing video game soundtracks? (And heaven forbid I listen to an actual radio station.)
Are they going to be suing Bose and Panasonic and all the other makers of speakers and headphones, as well, since you can potentially listen to video game music through those, and it might be video game music associated with PRS?
Are they going to be suing you and me because we have ears capable of listening to music we may not have paid for the right to listen to, because it's associated with PRS?
Yes, I'm being a wee bit increasingly hyperbolic here, but I hope I'm getting my point across. How much (more) double- or triple- or quadruple- or more -dipping does the PRS want to try to do here?
Also, more relevantly, Valve is not a "streaming service" that specifically contracts creators to make things like TV shows exclusively for their platform, such as Netflix or Disney+ or whatever. Valve is not contracting Microsoft to make Forza for them, nor EA to make FIFA, nor Rockstar to make GTA, nor any of the other games they sell. You, Performing Right Society, already got your fucking money from Microsoft and EA and Rockstar for that shit (or so I would assume). Trying to strong-arm Valve into also paying up, on top of that, seems like a ludicrous attempt at double-dipping to me.
Someone wants to sue Valve for lootboxes in games actually made by Valve? Be my fucking guest. Go right ahead with that. Fuck Valve right in the ass with a dried up corn cob, in that case. (Though I'm not sure how that's even relevant enough to have been mentioned in the above linked article, given that the only connection is "Valve being sued by somebody.") Someone wants to sue Valve because they're selling video games that happen to have music in them, because they (speciously) claim Valve doesn't have the rights to that music (because Valve shouldn't need the rights to the music in video games they sell, because any rights issues should have already been managed and paid for by the people who actually fucking made and published the video games in question), though? Fuck off forever with that asinine dumbfuckery.
Seriously, what subtle nuance am I missing here that would make this make sense? Is Valve actually in the wrong here?
Or is this lawsuit truly as clownshoes bonkers as it seems? How much are they suing them for? All the money in the world?
IANAL, but let me see if I'm correctly understanding this here. These assclowns are suing Valve because...
...
...Valve sells video games via Steam that happen to have music in them? And they're saying that Valve doesn't have the rights to that music? I mean, they're not talking about games specifically made by Valve, since they mention shit like Forza Horizon and FIFA and Grand Theft Auto. They're saying that for any game sold on Steam that has music associated with The Performing Right Society in them, Valve must pay The Performing Right Society for the right to sell those games?
Does this seem like the stupidest dumbshit ever shat out of a dog's diseased asshole to anyone else?
So...
Are they going to be suing GOG and Epic Games Store and such, too?
Are they going to be suing Walmart, Target, Best Buy, GameStop, etc.? They also sell video games, after all.
Are they going to be suing Apple and Samsung for making smartphones capable of playing music? I mean, I've put video game soundtracks on my phone and listened to them in the car. Speaking of which...
Are they going to be suing Toyota and General Motors and Ford and the rest because they put sound systems in their cars that are capable of playing video game soundtracks? (And heaven forbid I listen to an actual radio station.)
Are they going to be suing Bose and Panasonic and all the other makers of speakers and headphones, as well, since you can potentially listen to video game music through those, and it might be video game music associated with PRS?
Are they going to be suing you and me because we have ears capable of listening to music we may not have paid for the right to listen to, because it's associated with PRS?
Yes, I'm being a wee bit increasingly hyperbolic here, but I hope I'm getting my point across. How much (more) double- or triple- or quadruple- or more -dipping does the PRS want to try to do here?
Also, more relevantly, Valve is not a "streaming service" that specifically contracts creators to make things like TV shows exclusively for their platform, such as Netflix or Disney+ or whatever. Valve is not contracting Microsoft to make Forza for them, nor EA to make FIFA, nor Rockstar to make GTA, nor any of the other games they sell. You, Performing Right Society, already got your fucking money from Microsoft and EA and Rockstar for that shit (or so I would assume). Trying to strong-arm Valve into also paying up, on top of that, seems like a ludicrous attempt at double-dipping to me.
Someone wants to sue Valve for lootboxes in games actually made by Valve? Be my fucking guest. Go right ahead with that. Fuck Valve right in the ass with a dried up corn cob, in that case. (Though I'm not sure how that's even relevant enough to have been mentioned in the above linked article, given that the only connection is "Valve being sued by somebody.") Someone wants to sue Valve because they're selling video games that happen to have music in them, because they (speciously) claim Valve doesn't have the rights to that music (because Valve shouldn't need the rights to the music in video games they sell, because any rights issues should have already been managed and paid for by the people who actually fucking made and published the video games in question), though? Fuck off forever with that asinine dumbfuckery.
Seriously, what subtle nuance am I missing here that would make this make sense? Is Valve actually in the wrong here?
Or is this lawsuit truly as clownshoes bonkers as it seems? How much are they suing them for? All the money in the world?