kane_magus: (Default)
"Maria Florinda Perez, a 32-year-old Guatemalan immigrant, was killed on Nov. 5 after she mistakenly went to the incorrect home in the Indianapolis suburb of Whitestown."

"Stand your ground" laws should be renamed to "It's coming right for us!" laws. Because that's basically what they are: excuses to murder people, scot-free, just so long as one """""believes""""" they are in danger.

Or maybe not, in this particular case, if the prosecution gets what they want, which is to prove that "stand your ground" laws do not apply here. Hopefully, they will get what they want.
kane_magus: (Default)

"Hi. In today's episode of Even More News, Katy, Cody and Jonathan discuss the tragic mass shootings that occurred over the weekend, Donald Trump's National Presidential Security Measure - 7 which labels most non-MAGA beliefs to be a gateway to domestic terrorism, and they get into the James Comey's indictment."



Yeah, mass shootings have become so routine now that MAGAts have a ready-made plan to simply make use of them to vilify the left, even if the shooter may have had nothing whatsoever to do with the left and everything to do with their own "side."

Nice "hmm" when Jonathan was reading that list and got to the "support for the overthrow of the United States government" bullet point.

...

Re: the "Department of War," I'm just still waiting for the Department of Justice to be more accurately renamed to the "Department of Vengeance."

...

Heh, they mention that whole "Am I watching things on television that are different from what's happening?" thing, too.

Yeah, all of this, every single goddamned bit of it, is nothing but manufactured bullshit, engineered specifically so that idiots who do absolutely nothing but sit around and consume RWNJ "media" all day can see all this bullshit and say "Yeah, that's our guy, our tough president!"

...

And speaking of the "Department of Vengeance."

*weary goddamned motherfucking sigh*

Okay, look, every time someone blames Comey as "the guy who may have helped Trump become president last time"/"the guy who won him the election" (and repeats it again later), I feel the need to bring up the True Pundit Hoax (here for reference) yet again. Like, I don't give much of a shit about James Comey himself, per se.[1] But I don't think Comey should be blamed (or, at least, solely blamed or even mostly blamed) for doing the thing he was essentially blackmailed by Trumplandia into doing, because if he hadn't done it... well... no, I guess I can't say that things would have ended up worse, because the worst still happened, regardless: Trump was elected in 2016.

And of course, all of that is predicated upon the belief that Seth Abramson is not entirely full of shit, and based on my prior following of him[2], he was rather credible. He would consistently report on things back in 2015 and 2016 that it would take the mainstream media six months to a year or more to pick up on. Not that any of that shit mattered, in the end, because Trump still got elected. Twice.

But even if none of that was true, even if Comey really did twirl his figurative mustache like Snidely Whiplash and decide all on his own to "put his thumb on the scales" and win the election for Trump, it's still wrong for Trump to have him (or anyone else) targeted for (unrelated) frivolous indictments like this, just because he's one of delusional Trump's perceived enemies.

...

I do appreciate Jonathon's self correction.



[1] - And I agree with Cody that Trump's mooks are going after Comey first because, indeed, "the left" doesn't care about Comey, given that "Comey is the guy who got Trump elected last time" so fuck him or whatever. They're going first after guys like Comey that "the left" doesn't care about in order to "normalize" this whole thing, rather than starting with, like, Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton or whoever.

[2] - Back in the days before I completely nuked my Twitter卐 account, after which I essentially stopped following him in the same way that I stopped following everyone on Twitter卐, nor have I started refollowing him on Bluesky or Threads or Substack or any of the other places he moved to after apparently abandoning the trashfire that is Twitter卐, since I don't have accounts on those sites either, nor do I plan to make accounts on those sites just for him.
kane_magus: (Default)

"Hi. On today's episode, Katy, Cody, and Jonathan talk about the shooting at an ICE facility in Dallas, Jimmy Kimmel's return, and Donald Trump's bizarre press conference attempting to link acetaminophen and autism."



Are all of these recent (and upcoming, because you know there will be more) shooters just going to turn out to be 4chan shitposters or whatever?

And I'm not quite to the point where I believe that the FBI agents themselves actually might have just sprinkled some crackSharpied some slogans onto those bullets themselves, but at the same time... given that the current FBI is simply yet another tool (full of tools) of the Trump """""administration,""""" I wouldn't exactly put it past them, either.

But yeah, it's more likely that this current guy was just yet another terminally online, brain-rotted piece of shit.

...

This video is a wee bit out of date, because Sinclair and Nexstar did not, in fact, "stick to their guns."

...

When Trump gets in front of a camera and talks, it's never not embarrassing. Whether it's him confidently rambling a bunch of word salad or it's him angrily spewing a bunch of word salad or it's him sarcastically quipping a bunch of word salad or it's him badly mangling a direct teleprompter read into word salad, it's just sad. See also: every time Trump publishes words online via a social media post of any sort. Sad!

Apparently, leucovorin is the new hydroxychloroquine, i.e. a random drug that Trump just brainlessly shills as the new be-all, end-all cure for a thing. For autism, in leucoverin's case, like hydroxychloroquine supposedly was for COVID-19.
kane_magus: (Default)
A post on The Daily Cartoonist.

A lot of it is a bunch of portrayals of Trump's address to the United Nations, all accurate in their own ways.
kane_magus: (Default)

"Hi. It's been a few months since the One Big Beautiful Bill Act was signed by Donald Trump, and you may have already forgotten what a turd it is."



Regarding the video description, it's not necessarily because it was forgettable, but because there has been so much other, equally terrible, maybe even worse dumbshit since then.

After watching the video, which I didn't really feel the need to "live blog" as I do sometimes... all I feel the need to say, which Cody touched on but didn't state out right, is this: Even if the Democrats win big in 2026 and retake the House and Senate, when all these Big Beautiful Bullshit things start taking effect, lots of very stupid people (and not just Trumpanzees) will then entirely blame the Democrats and nobody else for these horrid things that the GQP did. This is also by design.
kane_magus: (Default)
A post on The Daily Cartoonist.

"Darkow's character is correct: Kirk had called for release of the Epstein files. But there are all sorts of things Kirk said that aren't being brought up by his supporters, including those who'd never heard of him until he was murdered.

"It doesn't matter, because in the moment of his death, he became a product, not a person, and he's being marketed, not mourned."
kane_magus: (Default)
Two things I happened to see in my Google News app a little while ago:

"Obama calls Jimmy Kimmel suspension 'government coercion'"

"Star Trek Actor Tim Russ Mocks Charlie Kirk's Death With Captain Kirk Image"

One of these things is obviously much more serious than the other, but they're both examples of MAGA's backlash over the Charlie Kirk murder and their use of it as a justification to continue doing that thing they were already doing anyway even before Charlie Kirk got shot, which is to attempt to silence those they perceive to be enemies. In other words, they're hypocritically trying to take away the First Amendment rights of those with whom they have grievances. You know... the First Amendment... that very thing for which Charlie Kirk (ostensibly) was some supposed great champion? *eye roll*

Also, I have something to say about William Shatner's seemingly innocuous comments mentioned in that second link there:

"Just because someone believes something different than you do shouldn't make them targets. Accept that they don't see your views & move on. It's differing viewpoints that make life interesting & makes the world go round... unless you believe the earth is flat; then I guess it just sits there."

I fully agree that just having "differing viewpoints" shouldn't get you murdered.

However, the "differing viewpoints" of far too many raging asshats are that all brown people should be deported (or be killed), or that all trans people should be institutionalized (or be killed), or that all homeless people should also be institutionalized (or be killed), or that all same sex couples should lose their right to be married (or be killed), or that all women should lose the right to vote and do nothing but dutifully pump out babies (or be killed), or that all black people should be re-enslaved or sent back to Africa (or be killed), or that anyone and everyone should be just fine with potentially being shot (and being killed) by a gun to support the Second Amendment. At least some of those "differing viewpoints" were, in fact, spewed by Charlie Kirk himself. If those are the "differing viewpoints" that Mr. Shatner is referring to, then no, I really don't think we should just "accept that" and "move on." Those "differing viewpoints" do not "make life interesting" nor do they "make the world go round." They turn life and the world into a hellish nightmare that we need to fight back against. Especially when the aforementioned raging asshats are in positions of power in our government, both low and high, up to and including the highest of all, which is currently occupied by an orange puddle of diarrhea badly masquerading as a human being (with apologies to both actual diarrhea and actual human beings for the unfair comparison).

Hell, I'd prefer it if the "differing viewpoints" were just silly dumbshit like the world is flat or whatever.

And as for Robert Beltran... meh. He has apparently well and truly proven himself by this point to just be a full on MAGA fuckhead whose opinions don't even really merit consideration at all anymore. Fuck Chakotay. I'm not saying that he should be murdered or even that he should have his right to spew stupid horseshit be removed. I'm just saying we shouldn't pay attention to his moronic ass when he does spew stupid horseshit.
kane_magus: (Default)

"Hi. In today's episode, Katy, Cody, and Jonathan discuss the ongoing fallout from Charlie Kirk's murder and how it overshadowed yet another school shooting. They dig into the increasingly vitriolic language on the right and the doxxing of people, mostly teachers, who post even remotely negative things about Kirk."



Initial reaction based just on the title and text description: I mean, yeah. Of course they are. It would be more surprising if they didn't act like hypocritical jackasses. It's certainly what Charlie Kirk himself would have been doing, if it had been some other RWNJ asshole that got murdered instead of him.

Now to actually watch the video.

Yeah... there was a school shooting on the same goddamn day that Charlie Kirk was shot, if you didn't already know about it.

So... Donald Trump is a flagrant hypocrite, is what you're saying. Yeah, this was already well known. In any case, the real problem here is the fact that Donald Trump said that the "radical left" is the real problem.

So yeah, Donald Trump didn't actually say that he "could [not] care less about bringing our country together" (though it's very easy to see that he explicitly does not care at all about bringing our country together), and the thing that he actually did say was horrible enough that it would have been more than sufficient to simply quote him verbatim to demonstrate what a vile shithead he is, rather than inaccurately paraphrasing the thing he said.

To hell with the New York Post, just like Faux Noise and all the rest of RWNJ "news" "media." They're going to spin this shit in the way that they always spin this shit, and they all need to be shut down yesterday. Or, like, thirty years ago.

Matt Walsh can entirely fuck right off the planet Earth, too, as far as I'm concerned.

Ben Shapiro can entirely fuck right off the planet Earth, too, as far as I'm concerned.

And, hell yeah, you go, Bill Maher. Rare props where props are due, I guess. I mean, the fact that you had Ben Shitpiro on your show at all, to being with isn't great, obviously, but still, at least you shut down his spew of horseshit a tiny bit.

Also... wow. If anyone takes anything that's been said (or, at least, that I personally have seen/heard said) on Some More News and Even More News and uses that as an excuse to go out and murder someone, then that person was already so far out of touch with reality that the light of the sun hasn't reached the place they were at yet. And yet, I can still get why Cody was "fucked up" about it. Had no idea that they were literally considering canceling the show as a result of it. Granted, this is the first I'm even hearing about that at all. (The context here being that something like this absolutely did happen with Ben Shapiro, and he apparently publicly displayed not even an ounce of remorse or self-reflection as a result of it.)

Jonathan: "No one's saying that criticizing someone leads to violence, but no one's saying that people don't get ideas in their head based on the words they hear, whether those words are incendiary or not. Right? I think we can stand tall in the argument that the right's language is more incendiary than the left's. Like, flat out, I would stand behind that. I will pull quote for quote with Matt Walsh."

Cody: "100%"

Katy: "Yeah, that is a hill I would die on."

Also, this. Basically, Ben Shapiro does, on a regular basis, the very thing that he condemns the left for supposedly doing.

There's certainly nothing wrong with calling a thing what it actually is, though.

(They keep talking about Hasan, in both this and previous videos, and though I've never watched any of that guy's stuff before, I'm kind of wondering if maybe I should start. I don't care about watching Twitch streams at all, but he does have a Youtube channel as well. Then again, I already feel like I'm too bombarded with political shit, even aside from the stuff I actively seek out like Some More News and Last Week Tonight and The Daily Cartoonist and the like, so... maybe I won't.)
kane_magus: (Default)
A post on The Daily Cartoonist.

Lots of text behind cut )

Wow, this ended up being a much longer post than I thought it would be when I first started it.
kane_magus: (Default)
"Despite initial reports and President Trump's claim that the suspect in the murder of Charlie Kirk was a 'leftist', two pieces of evidence point the other way"

This was the top most article in my Google News app when I checked it just now, up in the Top News section (which completely ignores my settings for what I want and don't want to see in my Google News feed [even more so than the rest of the feed does, anyway]).

First of all, consider the source.

Second of all... this reads to me like a left wing news site trying, desperately, to paint Charlie Kirk's murderer as a RWNJ kook, just as much as Trump and the Trumpanzees are trying, desperately, to paint him as a "radical left" kook (which they were doing before we ever knew a single damn thing about the guy at all). The truth is probably more like what Jonathan said yesterday in that episode of the Even More News podcast, which is that these shooters tend to be "very disturbed and have a bizarre mishmash of ideologies," both from the right and from the left, that comes with being extremely/terminally online, and that seems to be possibly proving true in this case, as well.
kane_magus: (Default)

"Hi. Under The Desk News' V Spehar joins Katy, Cody, and Jonathan to talk about the assassination of Charlie Kirk. They discuss the details of the investigation, the Right's vitriolic attacks on the Left, the bizarre media canonization of Kirk, and the uncertain future of political rhetoric.

"As always, we recorded right before that big thing that happened."



Yes, Jesse Watters, everyone is accountable, and we are watching what you are saying on television, you fucking rat. (Well, no, I am not watching it, because I wouldn't seriously watch Faux Noise outside of clips provided by others like SMN here if I were paid to do it, but yeah, at least some people who actually matter are watching it.)

All this performative RWNJ rage is just yet more examples of RWNJ accusations also acting as RWNJ confessions or statements of intent. Their responses to what they claim to be exclusively left wing fearmongering and calls for violence is to... ... ... ... ...fearmonger and call for violence against the left. Seriously, why is it okay to demonize the entirety of liberals and Democrats and anyone who hasn't fallen in line with MAGA brainwashing, based solely on the actions of one solitary dickweed, but if anyone tries that with all the RWNJ dickweeds who have committed or attempted to commit murders and other horrendous violence (and, indeed, far more RWNJ dickweeds have done this shit than left wing dickweeds), the RWNJs cry "how dare you" and circle the wagons? Go figure.

I have not seen the video of Charlie Kirk being shot, nor do I ever want to watch the video of Charlie Kirk getting shot, and the way their guest describes watching the video of Charlie Kirk getting shot makes me glad I didn't. And it also makes me glad that this here Dreamwith blog is my only social media "presence" now, because they're talking about having accidentally seen this shit, because it just appeared without warning in their feeds, and that's horrifying.

I really appreciate what Katy is saying here. I've been going back and forth on this myself over the past day or so, but I think my feelings that this was horrific and shouldn't happen to anyone far outweigh my feelings that Charlie Kirk was a "bad guy" who "deserved" something "bad" happening to him.

Also this from the guest.

And now they're getting into the stuff that I wrote four paragraphs above, i.e. the whole "it's okay to say the left is the 'party of murder' or whatever, but don't you dare try to draw any conclusions when a RWNJ does a murder" shit. And, apparently, according to Cody, some RWNJ literally said "this is our Reichstag fire" as if that's a wonderful thing.

I'm going to say something that might be a bit inappropriate here but... okay, so... you know how Israel has used the October 7, 2023 Hamas attacks as an excuse to do full scale genocide on Palestinians? That's sort of what this right here feels like, at least based on recent RWNJ rhetoric. Like they're using Charlie Kirk's murder as an excuse to gear up and start doing "genocide" on liberals and Democrats. I seriously doubt it will come to that, but that's certainly what it sounds like all the RWNJs want to do, up to and including the current President. Or, at the very least, it seems like they might be hoping that this results in even more RWNJ "lone shooters" going after left wing politicians and journalists and the like.

Honestly, I could not care less if the Trump video was edited together from different takes or about the difficulties involved in making a 4 minute video of a teleprompter read or whatever. What matters is what the asshole was officially shown as saying, not how it was presented. And what he essentially said was that political violence and violent rhetoric is the exclusive domain of the Left, which is patently false, given that Trump himself has made himself the king of violent rhetoric over the past decade now. But all that is fine, because it's him doing it. Only his enemies should be barred from it.

And for everyone going on about how, oh, Charlie Kirk at least was a debater, all for free speech, rah rah rah, well... here is an example of Charlie Kirk "debating." As with Jordan Peterson, it's not in good faith.

"News" has been fucked for decades now, at the very least since October 7, 1996, if not well before that. I've already said my piece (and have repeated it multiple times, including now) about what I think needs to be done in regards to that, and the current government seems to be hellbent on doing the exact polar opposite of that now, so what the fuck can any of the rest of us actually do about it?

Everything is a fucking trashfire shitshow right now, and it's not going to get better any time soon. (Roughly three and one-third years left of Donald Trump as POTUS, or potentially less than that + however long with JD Vance as POTUS. Woof.)
kane_magus: (Default)
A post on The Daily Cartoonist.

This one is (again) about Charlie Kirk's murder, (a tiny bit about Gaza), Trump's raging response to Charlie Kirk's murder, how some political cartoonists and, indeed, journalists in general are failing to cover Charlie Kirk's murder "properly," how Charlie Kirk himself maybe, just maybe, isn't actually the paragon of virtue that all his buddies are making him out to be in the wake of his death, how the Second Amendment and guns in general are utter fucking bullshit, and how Trump is an abject goddamn hypocrite in his condemnation of violent rhetoric and his absurd claims that it only comes from the Left.

(I've considered making a "charlie kirk" tag, but that would require me to go and backtag every prior post that has ever mentioned Charlie Kirk, and I don't feel like bothering. He's really not worth the effort.)
kane_magus: (Default)
A post on The Daily Cartoonist.

It's almost entirely about the Charlie Kirk assassination, the rampant epidemic of gun violence in the United States of America that has been ongoing for decades now, and the partisan divide over which gun deaths actually "matter" or not.

Also this, from a couple years ago: "Charlie Kirk Says Gun Deaths 'Unfortunately' Worth it to Keep 2nd Amendment"

I wonder if Charlie Kirk still felt that way in the last moments of his life.

To hell with the Second Amendment.

(EDIT)

Also, some people, such as in the comments under that The Daily Cartoonist post, are already wondering if this could possibly be a Reichstag fire moment for the Trump """""administration.""""" Or if it was retaliation by Trump for Kirk's insistence that the Epstein files be fully released. I personally don't think that even Trump would so evil as to have had his good buddy Charlie Kirk murdered, either as a false flag op or as retaliation for the Epstein shit (or just as yet another distraction from the Epstein shit) or for any other reason, but who the hell actually knows? Donald J. Trump is infamous for not giving a shit about anyone not named Donald J. Trump, after all.

(/EDIT)
kane_magus: (Default)
A post on The Daily Cartoonist.
kane_magus: (Default)

"Hi. Labor journalist Kim Kelly joins Katy, Cody, and Jonathan to talk about the mass shooting in Minneapolis, the leadership purge at the CDC, the attempted purge at the Federal Reserve, and of course, Cracker Barrel."



To start with, some stuff about coal miners and about how Trump actually hates them as much as anyone else (or, perhaps more accurately, is just as indifferent to them as he is to anyone not named Donald Trump, anyway), while simultaneously lying about how much he loves them, because lying is a thing that Trump just does a lot.

As for the recent shooting... it would be far more surprising if RWNJs didn't use this particular shooting to ramp up anti-trans hate, so... of course they're doing that. The apparent fact that this person was trans should be the very least of anyone's concerns, considering all the other rancid dogshit allegedly associated with this person. But no, we don't hear about that. All we hear is that they were trans, which means all trans people are evil and must be (further) vilified. *weary goddamn sigh*

Strange how, when it's a cis and/or white and/or male and/or RWNJ person who does a mass shooting, as is actually the case far more often than not, we don't hear them ramping up anti-cis/white/male/RWNJ hate. Go fucking figure.

(And again, if "God" "saved" Trump in Butler, "He" did so only to have Trump available for [re]infliction upon the country a few months later, because Trump is nothing if not a [vaguely] human-shaped natural disaster.)

As for all the other stuff, re: the CDC and the Fed... *shrug* ...just typical Trump """""administration""""" disastrous bullshit. Bullshit that needs to stop or be stopped, but there's not a damn thing that most of us can do about it until after Trump is gone, at the very earliest.

And I could not really care less about Cracker Barrel. If they want to change their logo and then change it back again just because a bunch of whingey fuckheads (including Trump) whinged about it, then blah de fucking blah.
kane_magus: (Default)
A post on The Daily Cartoonist.

This one is almost entirely about gun violence. Gee, I wonder why.
kane_magus: (Default)
(EDIT) Swapped the URLs, because I had them wrongly switched around, with yesterday's as today, and today's as yesterday. (/EDIT)

A post on The Daily Cartoonist.

Also, yesterday's CSotD post from The Daily Cartoonist, because I missed it.

(I leave it as an exercise to the reader to decipher which tag below is associated with which post there.)
kane_magus: (Default)
A post on The Daily Cartoonist.
kane_magus: (Default)

"Hi. Katy, Cody and Jonathan talk about Trump's vague and unenforceable executive order on medicare drug costs, Qatar's very transparent bribing of Trump with a luxury plane, and the administration's continued push to suspend due process and habeas corpus for immigrants."



Live blogging, or whatever one wants to call it, behind cut )

Profile

kane_magus: (Default)
kane_magus

January 2026

S M T W T F S
    1 2 3
4 5678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Page generated Jan. 6th, 2026 04:39 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios