Good riddance, and it's about time. (EDIT: link replaced because the old link no longer works.)
That's a fine first step. He still has his radio show though, which is arguably even worse. And the "Ailes emphasized that Fox and Beck will continue to work together." line is a bit troubling. Not sure what that's about, but it can't be anything good. Oh well, his Faux Noise show ending is still a good start, though.
That's a fine first step. He still has his radio show though, which is arguably even worse. And the "Ailes emphasized that Fox and Beck will continue to work together." line is a bit troubling. Not sure what that's about, but it can't be anything good. Oh well, his Faux Noise show ending is still a good start, though.
no subject
no subject
Date: 2011-04-08 02:12 am (UTC)From:To go off on a tangent, I'm seeing some morons spreading the idiocy that this boycott against Glenn Beck is somehow infringing on his first amendment rights. Here's my take on that: Do I want to see Glenn Beck's right of free speech taken away? No, I do not, which is good because that is not what is being done here. However, do I want to see the outlets available for Glenn Beck to use in the process of spreading his fear/hate-mongering eventually be limited merely to him standing on a street corner somewhere with a sandwich board, because no one else is willing to give him any more air-time/book deals/speaking engagements/use of their venues to hold rallies/whatever? Why yes. Yes indeed I do.