![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Or so they say, speaking as though this were somehow a bold, revolutionary, previously unheard of way to go about making video games, rather than blatantly obvious common fucking sense and something which they already should have been doing all along.
I just hope that "completeness," in this case, doesn't simply mean a return to on-disc DLC, the practice of which they had (ostensibly) abandoned, due to the backlash they received over it. Because it is asinine. But then, releasing bare bones games with many core (or what used to be core) features missing, as they did with Street Fighter V, is even more asinine.
Found indirectly via![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
rabbitucker via a Facebook post I won't be linking to here because it's friend-locked. (And I say "indirectly" because he linked to IGN, whereas I found a similar article on PC Gamer, because I don't like IGN all that much.)
I just hope that "completeness," in this case, doesn't simply mean a return to on-disc DLC, the practice of which they had (ostensibly) abandoned, due to the backlash they received over it. Because it is asinine. But then, releasing bare bones games with many core (or what used to be core) features missing, as they did with Street Fighter V, is even more asinine.
Found indirectly via
rabbitucker via a Facebook post I won't be linking to here because it's friend-locked. (And I say "indirectly" because he linked to IGN, whereas I found a similar article on PC Gamer, because I don't like IGN all that much.)
