Just curious, does anyone more familiar with lawyer type stuff than I am who may read this happen to know what "enhanced disbarment" means? Mostly, I'm curious about the "enhanced" bit, and Google isn't being particularly helpful in providing a meaning at the moment.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-05 04:55 pm (UTC)From:He's such a crackpot!
no subject
Date: 2008-06-05 05:03 pm (UTC)From:Since it must be shown that he's a danger at the time of disbarment, to have it removed after those 10 years are up it must be shown that he's no longer a danger. If he tries to fight the accusations that he was dangerous to begin with, he'll automatically fail to get it removed. So given Jack's personality (He stomped out of the courtroom claiming the judge didn't have the authority to disbar him.) it's pretty much a given he'll never be practicing law again. It would be fun to see him attempt it tho, because he'll be arrested and thrown in jail for practicing law without a license. :)
no subject
Date: 2008-06-05 08:37 pm (UTC)From:Well... This is an interesting turn of events.
Is it possible for him to get re-barred in another state during his enhanced disbarment?
no subject
Date: 2008-06-06 12:45 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2008-06-07 10:49 am (UTC)From:! A major asshole that is disrespectful of the court system and that has already been disbarred for countless abuses of said system despite many chances and warnings over the course of a couple decades is attempting to be barred in your district. Cancel/Allow
no subject
Date: 2008-06-09 08:45 pm (UTC)From:Case in point: Ray Ellison. Here in San Antonio, he built houses that were cheap, but fell apart in as little as 5-10 years. He got shut down by the government. He came back later, building houses with a new company, RayCo. They were just as shoddy, and the state stepped in. They would've shut him down a second time, had the company not been purchased by K-B. They still build cheap crap that falls apart.
Hence, my question about the next possible incarnation of Jack Thompson.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-09 10:56 pm (UTC)From:I could totally see him getting some kind of no-class talk show or something similar though, perhaps on FOX News.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-10 05:52 am (UTC)From:That being said, I don't have a lot of confidence in the American system these days so I agree, it could still happen anyway.
Addition...
Date: 2008-06-06 10:56 am (UTC)From:Oregon, Washington, Minnesota, Missouri, Georgia, New York, Maine, Arizona, California, Texas.
I found out about this after this story came out, and after making a call to a friend that works at the U of O Law Library.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-06 12:58 am (UTC)From:Having said that: Anyone who uses our legal system as a bludgeon to assault a person, business, or industry--regardless of whom or what those are--deserves to be reigned in harshly. He's in the process of reaping what he himself has sowed. There's a certain beauty in that... I'd think of it as karma or even more profoundly, life's execution of the Golden Rule.
The only sad part of this whole affair, well, two saddest parts is that Jack Thompson cannot be compelled to, well, shut up. The other (though he can be compelled) is to seek psychriatric help. I don't think everything is well with him mentally or emotionally if he feels as much venom towards an industry that I'm not sure has even caused him any unprovoked harm o.oa
no subject
Date: 2008-06-06 07:37 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2008-06-06 08:09 am (UTC)From: