![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Some disinformation in this article (e.g. "Trump did not have a serious opportunity to offer his side of the story in the House hearings on impeachment."), and some other laugh out loud asininity (e.g. "Trump’s evangelical supporters have pointed to his Supreme Court nominees, his defense of religious liberty, and his stewardship of the economy, among other things, as achievements that justify their support of the president."), but as far as the main thrust of the article is concerned, I fully agree: Trump must go. Better (incredibly, years) late than not at all, I suppose.
For reference: Christianity Today.
And, of course, so-called "Christian" Trumpanzees are now calling for boycotts of this Christianity Today, because it dared to call out their God Emperor for the malefactor that he is.
(EDIT) To be fair to Christianity Today, this is not the first time they've called out Trump, either. I mean, this article is chock-full of bullshit of the worst sort, too, with regards to the Democrats in general and Hillary Clinton in particular, but at least... like... they tried, I guess, concerning Trump, maybe? (/EDIT)
(EDIT 2) Here is the SCROTUS IMPOTUS's asinine take on the situaion. He won't be reading ET again. (/EDIT 2)
For reference: Christianity Today.
And, of course, so-called "Christian" Trumpanzees are now calling for boycotts of this Christianity Today, because it dared to call out their God Emperor for the malefactor that he is.
(EDIT) To be fair to Christianity Today, this is not the first time they've called out Trump, either. I mean, this article is chock-full of bullshit of the worst sort, too, with regards to the Democrats in general and Hillary Clinton in particular, but at least... like... they tried, I guess, concerning Trump, maybe? (/EDIT)
(EDIT 2) Here is the SCROTUS IMPOTUS's asinine take on the situaion. He won't be reading ET again. (/EDIT 2)
