This doesn't make sense to me at all, on a semantic level. Being an arm of a gigantic corporate publisher is not "indie," at least not by any definition of the term that I understand, anyway. Also, aside perhaps from way back at the very beginning when it was just called On-Line Systems and consisted of Ken and Roberta Williams making games out of their home, Sierra was never "indie," either, so calling it such now is rather disingenuous.
no subject
Date: 2014-08-22 05:56 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2014-08-22 07:06 pm (UTC)From:But even still, not really indie if they basically have the backing of a company.
no subject
Date: 2014-08-22 07:18 pm (UTC)From:Well, maybe I won't just dismiss this new King's Quest game out of hand like I probably otherwise would if it were just an in-house Activision cash-grab thing whoring out the Sierra name.