kane_magus: (Default)

Clickbait Title: I remember it so you don't have to.

Mild flashing effects in the last 40s.

"Pink Floyd - The Wall" deals with mature subject matter and contains intense imagery some viewers may find distressing.

As a full disclosure, I was briefly a contributor to Channel Awesome for about six months in 2014/15. Channel Awesome CEO Mike Michaud severed the relationship after he received angry emails about an exposé of 8chan I had published on Medium and I refused to take it down or commit to not doing "anything else like that." Several of the songs are a roundabout veiled reference to #ChangeTheChannel, a hashtag that gained some traction in the spring of 2018 as contributors and former contributors to Channel Awesome spilled all the beans about CA's incompetence and mismanagement. What started as a bunch of people sharing stories about how the scheduling page never worked right escalated to Channel Awesome leadership releasing a counterattack letter in which they inadvertently admitted to covering for a sex predator.




In reference to the stuff mentioned in the above video description, just to get it out of the way, have some links.

Anyway, as I said I probably would in the previous post, I watched the Folding Ideas video (embedded above) about the Nostalgia Critic's review (which I won't bother to link to here, because why would I) of Pink Floyd - The Wall.

This was a bit surreal for me. First, I've only heard the album The Wall. I haven't actually seen the movie itself (yet). (EDIT) I have since seen the full movie, too. (/EDIT) Second, I also haven't seen the Nostalgia Critic review of The Wall, and I'm not going to either, because, again, why would I. I saw more than enough of it in the above embedded thing. Lastly, I'd also never heard of Fennah or "Satellite City" or any of that shit before watching the above video, and I have little interest in checking out said animator or their work afterward, either.

As such... I really don't have a lot to say about this one. Um... let's see. Doug Walker is probably a way more deserving target of ridicule than James Rolfe was, for one. For another, this was probably a better video if only because it was about a single specific work of Doug Walker's, instead of... like... just being about everything James Rolfe has ever done from when he was a child until now, like the other one I posted about was.

Anyway, I guess I need to go watch Pink Floyd - The Wall now (EDIT a few hours later) and now I have (/EDIT). And I guess I need to go continue avoiding everything related to The Nostalgia Critic and Channel Awesome and Doug Walker now.
kane_magus: (Default)

"An Angry Video Game Nerd vs Irate Gamer video was announced. What do we think?"



First I'm hearing about this. Cinemassacre sure hasn't promoted it, at least as far as I've seen. I find myself feeling rather indifferent about it. I don't get why James Rolfe would do this... but whatever, if he wants to do it, it's fine, I guess. Not that it matters what I think about it, either way. *shrug*

I watched Irate Gamer[1] for a little while, back at the start, but the dude was seriously just a shameless rip-off of the Angry Nintendo Nerd (as he was called back then), even using the Nerd's own catchphrases at the time, and Chris Bores seemed like sort of a disingenuous whiner about behind the scenes crap, too, so I fairly quickly just stopped watching his stuff. I mean, yeah, sure, I'll probably watch this crossover between AVGN and IG, maybe, but it's not likely to get me to start regularly watching Bores's stuff again. (EDIT) Actually, no, I probably won't watch it. After posting this, I got to surfing the 'net about Irate Gamer/Chris Bores, and it reminded me again of why I quit watching his shit to begin with. (/EDIT)

I'll say this much (more), though, if Mr. Rolfe is going to be doing a crossover with someone, it is better, I suppose, that he does this thing with the Irate Gamer, rather than doing anything else with Doug Walker, so there's that, if nothing else. I will not be watching any more Channel Awesome videos, even if James Rolfe is involved in them, or any Cinemassacre videos that involve Doug (or Rob) Walker. (EDIT) Chris Bores is just as bad as the Walker brothers, in his own way. So, no, I retract my statement that James Rolfe working with Bores is an improvement over the hypothetical situation of Rolfe working with the Walkers again. (/EDIT)

I'd prefer to see some more stuff between James and Pat. That would be pretty cool.

[1] - Had to use the TVTropes page for him, since he doesn't even have a Wikipedia page, unlike James Rolfe.
kane_magus: (Default)
First one in a while. While I have been writing in my normal pencil and paper journal quite a bit lately about dreams I've had, I haven't written anything in my bona fide dream journal in several months. Until this morning, anyway. Also, in this here online journal, I have apparently only written one entry about the actual dream journal, even though I've written several entries pertaining to the dreams I recorded in the pencil and paper journal (though I'm hugely behind on that, and probably unlikely at this point to ever get caught up).

This entry, here, is about the actual dream journal. Basically, I'm going to transcribe all of the dreams I've written in that thing since that previous post. So, I left off in... 2009 holy shit really? That's the year I started the damn thing. Yeah, this might take a while. >_>; I'll try to keep the same format from the previous post here as well. Note, again, that these are from the actual dream journal, written immediately after waking up, so unlike (most of) the ones I wrote in my normal journal, these will be more steam-of-conscious, with associated bad grammar (and no paragraph breaks) and shit like that. I'll fix the misspellings, at least, though. I think I'm going to refrain from making (editorial comments) the way I did in the previous entry, though.

Behind cut because fuck what a lot of text. I'm actually surprised it all made it into a single post. )
kane_magus: (Default)
Youtube and Twitter embeds behind cut )



For reference, Justin Carmical, aka JewWario, has been revealed as the groomer referred to in the "Jane Doe" section of the "Not So Awesome" document I mentioned in the previous post, which was (probably) inadvertently revealed via Channel Awesome's gross response to that document. Also for reference, Justin Carmical, aka JewWario, committed suicide via gunshot on January 23, 2014. These two circumstances were very likely inextricably related, I would imagine.

So yeah. Jesus fucking Christ. The guy who almost everyone had described before now as one of the nicest guys was actually a goddamn scumbag, as it turns out.

I mean, I wasn't even a fan of JewWario[1] and this still blows me away. This whole Channel Awesome clusterfucking quagmire just gets worse and worse.

Oh, and apparently the shit smears on the underwear of humanity from Irredeemably Toxic Shithole are spinning up the doxxing machines to try to sleuth out the identities of the victims and are also apparently harassing Carmical's widow over this. My faith in humanity sours by the second.

[1] - In the simple sense that I wasn't much aware of him at all, outside of the Channel Awesome anniversary videos and then later the references to his death via the videos and posts of others such as Pat Contri and James Rolfe and Noah Antwiler back when it first happened. (EDIT) So, I went and watched JewWario's short "You are not stupid" video that a lot of people have mentioned recently. As I watched that I got a real almost sort of Mister Rogers-like vibe from it. I'll be frank. If I didn't already know now that the guy was a sexually assaulting asswipe, that video just might probably have been a thing that would have convinced me to go back and watch his other stuff, because he appears to be a truly nice guy in that. I don't know if it's like Ian said in the above video about how his supposed niceness might have just been a front or a M.O. or whatever you want to call it. The whole situation is a fucking disgrace all around. (/EDIT)
kane_magus: (Default)


Following up on this. See also: this.

Yeah, I'm still kind of keeping half an eye on all the drama going on, out of sheer morbid curiosity, but aside from that, I'm pretty much done with it all.

(EDIT)

Oh, and there's also this Google Doc file that was compiled and released a day or two ago.

(EDIT 4) And here is a second thread on those resetera forums in direct response to the release of the above document, though more stuff comes to light in subsequent posts after that as well. Like I said, morbid curiosity is what drives me at this point. (/EDIT 4)

(/EDIT)

(EDIT 2) And here is the Channel Awesome "apology" tweet. TL;DR version: "We regret that you feel bad. We blocked people because we felt we had to. Please stop talking bad about us now." (/EDIT 2)

(EDIT 3)


(/EDIT 3)
kane_magus: (Default)
(EDIT 3) Here is a follow-up to the below. (/EDIT 3) (EDIT 5) See also: this. (/EDIT 5)

(EDIT 6) I've since started watching Cinemassacre stuff again, so disregard any specific references I make to them below. (/EDIT 6)

And pretty much anything that was/is even tangentially related to them.

This is why, at least in part. (I found it via rumblings in the past few days in my Twitter timeline. It's mostly about Channel Awesome, but there's a bit of Cinemassacre stuff in there as well. [EDIT] To be fair, a lot of that thread is just a bunch of randos expressing rando opinions, so take it with a grain of salt. I was more interested in the initial post with links directly to the Twitter accounts of former Channel Awesome contributors, than I was with the rando circlejerking, interesting [or at least amusing] though some of it admittedly was. [/EDIT])

It's basically more of the same. Behind the scenes shit that throws a pall over my enjoyment of the on screen stuff.

With Channel Awesome, it's been brewing for a very long time, at least since the shit with Spoony went down back in 2012 or whenever (I never really posted about that in particular here, outside of that one post above, but if you care, just Google "Spoony meltdown 2012," though some of the Spoony stuff is rehashed in that forum thread to which I first linked above), and it's kind of a wonder that I hadn't already long since dropped the lot of them.

With Cinemassacre, it's been brewing at least since the videos involving Alpha Omega Sin, as well as other shit that has come to light.

(EDIT) With that said, if anyone else wants to continue watching Channel Awesome or Cinemassacre content, that's fine. I'm just speaking for myself. I still enjoyed their content up until now (and I won't say that I'll never watch another Nostalgia Critic or AVGN video in my life, either, just that it's unlikely at this point). (EDIT 3) Yeah, no, I can safely say now that I will never watch another Nostalgia Critic video, nor anything else that Doug or Rob Walker is ever involved in. (/EDIT 3) In fact, I wrote another long-winded post about just that very sort of thing, as well. Granted, what I'm saying here kind of contradicts that, at least as far as my own behavior is concerned, but I'm not going to knock anyone else if they still want to watch this or related stuff. (/EDIT)

(EDIT 2)

Yeah, Channel Awesome is pretty much dead now. Most of the (few remaining) big name contributors have pulled the plug within the past week or so, particularly Linkara. Of the big names, pretty much the only ones still there are Angry Joe (who has been completely silent on this whole topic for the past couple weeks) and Cinema Snob (aka Brad Jones). (EDIT 4) Nope, Angry Joe left, too. (/EDIT 4)

And the response of Channel Awesome apparently was to just immediately and unceremoniously delete all of their content. The Channel Awesome Twitter account and Doug and Rob Walker's personal Facebook pages are apparently also blocking pretty much anyone and everyone who is discussing this at all.

(/EDIT 2)
kane_magus: (kanethumb1)


I got several months behind on watching stuff on Channel Awesome and have just started getting caught up in the past day or so (the Nostalgia Critic/Doug Walker bits of the site, anyway). As stated in the above video itself, that is from the end of the Nostalgia Critic review of "Inspector Gadget Saves Christmas." And yes, he actually got Cree Summer to do the Penny voice for that bit. That's pretty frickin' awesome.

Of course, that's not the first time Doug has gotten celebrities to be be in his videos.
kane_magus: (kanethumb1)
(EDIT) Or, rather, it's not a new policy, but just one that finally hit a Youtuber with a big enough following to raise a bigger stink about it. Which means that lots of "little guy" Youtubers have most assuredly been having to deal with this shit for a while now. See also, #WTFU. (/EDIT)

Here is what they consider to be non-advertiser-friendly content:

Content that is considered "not advertiser-friendly" includes, but is not limited to:

  • Sexually suggestive content, including partial nudity and sexual humor
  • Violence, including display of serious injury and events related to violent extremism
  • Inappropriate language, including harassment, profanity and vulgar language
  • Promotion of drugs and regulated substances, including selling, use and abuse of such items
  • Controversial or sensitive subjects and events, including subjects related to war, political conflicts, natural disasters and tragedies, even if graphic imagery is not shown
If any of the above describes any portion of your video, then the video may not be approved for monetization. If monetization is approved, your video may not be eligible for all available ad formats. YouTube reserves the right to not monetize a video, as well as suspend monetization features on channels that repeatedly submit videos violating our policies.


Hell, the "profanity and vulgar language" thing alone would kill most of the Youtube channels that I watch, such as Super Best Friends Play, Cinemassacre, Channel Awesome, Angry Joe, Pat the NES Punk, etc. And the "controversial and sensitive subjects and events" thing is just way too fucking vague and broad to be useful at all.

Honestly, at this point, I'm struggling to comprehend why any content creators are still bothering to use Youtube at all, if Youtube is going to have this gigantic a stick up its collective ass.

My guess, though, is that Youtube will start backpedaling super hard over this shit over the next few days or so and that, ultimately, nothing will change from what it has been up to now to any real extent. In any case, I'm glad I already don't bother to host anything on there, even if I had anything worthwhile to host in the first place.
kane_magus: (kanethumb1)


(EDIT) Having finally seen the movie... yeah. This is 98% accurate (again, except for the "Meninist" stuff at the end). (/EDIT)

I don't know how good this is as a review of the movie itself, as I still haven't seen it yet, but as a "review" of all aspects of the Fan Dumb and Hate Dumb surrounding this movie, this is absolutely spot on.

(Except for the bit at the end involving the asshole "Meninist" characters. That I found to be unconvincing, because if they'd truly been representative of actual Irredeemably Toxic Shithole-types, they simply would have threatened to rape and/or kill the "little girl" who claimed to like the movie, as is their wont, rather than decide to "go complain about real shit.")
kane_magus: (kanethumb1)



I've seen the Black Nerd in a Nostalgia Critic crossover, but I think I'ma finally subscribe to him outright. Maybe go back and watch some of his old stuff. If nothing else, he seems happier and less negative/pessimistic than most of the other reviewers I watch.

(Also, wait... Chris Hemsworth was in nuTrek? What? Who did he play? ...George Kirk? That was Thor? Holy shit, I had no idea.)
kane_magus: (kanethumb1)
"Doug and Rob finally talk about the ghostly reboot and the 'controversy' around it."




Let's just go ahead and get all of these reviews (or, at least, the ones from people whose opinions I actually give two shits about, anyway) out of the way as they hit. Doug and Rob gave the movie an "ehhh... it was okay" verdict. "A C+, maybe a B-" score. They didn't hate it nearly as much as Angry Joe and his friends did, but they didn't gush about it or fawn over it overmuch either. They did, however, talk a lot more about all the stupid bullshit "controversy" that surrounds the movie, which Joe only briefly touched on. You know, the same sort of shit I ranted about back during the whole fiasco surrounding the James Rolfe thing. So, yeah. (I think James Rolfe made the smartest call in just passing this movie over altogether, though I have to admit that I'd still kind of be interested in hearing his thoughts on it, even if I can pretty much already predict what those thoughts would be.)

In any case, nothing Doug and Rob said made my interest in seeing it get any higher, though, I'll just say that. My interest is still circling down the toilet.
kane_magus: (kanethumb1)


Hmm... I think this is something I might need to try at some point. >_>; I never had any of it as a kid either.
kane_magus: (kanethumb1)


I won't start holding my breath just yet, but yeah, things seem to be ever so slightly less shitty than they were prior to this #WTFU campaign, so that's good, I guess. However, there's the potential for things to become ever so much more shitty[1] than they already are now, which is bad, and there's no guessing involved there.

But really, though... zombie apocalypse?

And this goddamn bullshit.

"As we’ve witnessed in the past with legislation that has attempted to limit online piracy, on the day before the Copyright Office’s cut off date for submissions a rogue organization, Fight for the Future, staged a twenty-four cyber attack in an attempt to crash the Copyright Office’s servers and discredit the study.

"'FFTF employed a sophisticated campaign of technology and misinformation to electronically generate tens of thousands of identical canned comments to the CO website. Further instead of having users visit the consultation comment page for comments as the Copyright Office requires, FFTF used a web form hosted by Fight For The Future.' The Trichordist. Read Entire Post.

"There's really no other way to describe these kind of actions than coordinated cyber bullying campaigns built on distorted information to incite an angry online mob. A mob that mobilizes and then disappears quickly back into the shadows."


Fucking "cyber attack"? People making their voices heard in the face of some serious horseshit is "coordinated cyber bullying" now, according to these assholes? And these DMCA-abusing motherfuckers, of all people, have the gall to call Doug's video "misinformation"? Holy fucking shit. Wow.

(No, seriously, stop and consider this for a moment. These assholes are actually trying to compare this to run-of-the-mill 4chan/Anonymous/GamerGate bullshit. See what you've done, 4chan/Anonymous/GamerGate? You've gone and fucked around with your stupid little "movements" and "campaigns" and "crusades" and other such bullshit so much that now that something actually important has come along and a bunch of people get together to try to make something worthwhile happen, it just gets blown off as a "cyber attack" or "cyber bullying" or whatever.)

Oh, and not to even mention the fact that their bullshit is basically explicitly equating video game reviews and Let's Play videos to "online piracy" now.

It's just...

I mean, really...

*facepalm + weary sigh*

Yep, Doug's right, these are the goddamn morons that have to be dealt with before any headway at all will be able to be made on this issue. Sadly, frustratingly, these hateful shitbags have a fuckton of money and power and the ability to influence the clueless morons in government. This is not a new thing, by any means. I'm not sure if this is a case where Hanlon's razor can be applied, or if these asshats actually are being actively malicious with this deceitful bullshit. And I'm honestly not sure which would be worse. Either way, it's a terrible situation.

(EDIT) Also, some idiot in the comments under the Youtube video embedded above started comparing #WTFU to GamerGate. I made the horrid mistake of actually replying to him. (I don't know why I thought it was a good idea at the time to do so, looking back on it. I really, truly don't.) Actually, I wasn't even responding to him. I was responding to someone who had replied to him who tried to claim that GamerGate was oh so great until a "bunch of assholes" "hijacked" the "movement" and "jumped on the bandwagon" after the fact (the phrases in quotes were phrases the second guy actually used in his comment). I replied to that guy and said that, no, actually, there was no "hijacking" involved, since the "bunch of assholes" were the ones who started the whole "movement" in the first place, and that if anyone had "jumped on the bandwagon," it was the poor, clueless, misinformed fools who actually honestly cared about ethics in games journalism but who had unfortunately swallowed the GamerGate "actually, it's about ethics in games journalism" lie. I also said that comparing GamerGate to #WTFU is a grievous insult to #WTFU, since GamerGate is such an irredeemably toxic shithole (which, admittedly, was more a response to the original commenter than to the other guy). The original commenter replied to me, called me a "fucking moron" who "drank the Kool-Aid," and then spewed a bunch of the same old, banal, unsubstantiated, conspiracy theorist, false-flag horseshit, before apparently muting/blocking me. Ah, well, given that this sort of thing is typical of supporters of Irredeemably Toxic Shithole, after all, I don't know why I was expecting anything even remotely different. That's what I get for even reading Youtube comments in the first place, I suppose. *shrug* (/EDIT)

[1] - The funny/weird thing here is that both sides are claiming that the DMCA doesn't work. The difference is that #WTFU wants the broken shackles to be loosened, but these Takedown/Staydown assclowns want the broken shackles to be tightened even more. In any case, it goes to show how utterly broken the current copyright laws are. One side (#WTFU) wants to fix the broken parts of the law, whereas the other side (TD/SD) wants to double down and make the broken parts even more broken.
kane_magus: (kanethumb1)
So I finally did a bare modicum of research, and I just learned that, as it turns out, that AlphaOmegaSin guy, the guy who has been showing up more and more in Cinemassacre videos lately, is apparently a hardcore GamerGate supporter. I tried to watch a few of the guy's videos on the topic, and I may try again later, but for the moment, I just couldn't stomach the horseshit. I'm not entirely clear yet on if he's another of the supposed "good guys" (such as, ostensibly, TotalBiscuit) who unfortunately sucked down the lie of "Actually, it's about ethics in video game journalism," or if he's one of the scuzzier assholes, but it does appear, at least on the surface, that he's of the type to get super-buttwroth if someone dares to challenge Irredeemably Toxic Shithole, no matter what else. Whatever the case, like I've said in the past, it really doesn't matter either way, because if he claims to be a part of Irredeemably Toxic Shithole, then he's going to be tarred with the same feathers as the worst of the lot. That's just how ill-defined, amorphous "movements" on the Internet work, dawg.

In any case, what a damn shame. Guess I won't be watching any more Cinemassacre videos if he's in them (like how he was in the most recent James & Mike Mondays video and their Batman v Superman review, and in those he was pretty cringe-worthy already). And I really hope this doesn't mean that James and Mike and Bootsy and Ryan and whoever else are also Irredeemably Toxic Shithole supporters-by-association. As far as I am aware, none of the Cinemassacre guys have taken a stance on Irredeemably Toxic Shithole one way or the other, but the mere fact that they're hanging out with this guy at all is nebulously troubling to me, to say the least. If they ever do come out in support of Irredeemably Toxic Shithole... well... that will just have to be a case of "Nice knowing ya, Cinemassacre, don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out of my bookmarks list." On the other hand, I'm pretty sure Doug Walker has come out against Irredeemably Toxic Shithole in the past, or at the very least he has come out against the anti-feminist bullshit that is part and parcel of Irredeemably Toxic Shithole, anyway, and he's friends with James as well, so maybe he's a good counterbalancing influence. (EDIT 2) But then, as it turned out, Doug Walker himself has a bunch of problems, so maybe it's not such a good thing if he has or had any influence over James, after all. (/EDIT 2)

Anyway, speaking generally, acknowledging that there are indeed vast problems with the video game industry and the video game journalism industry on the one hand, and claiming to be a supporter of Irredeemably Toxic Shithole on the other hand, are two entirely separate things. You can do one without doing the other, and if you ever claim the latter, then no matter whatever else you may say or do, you pretty much lose all credibility in my eyes. The problem, though, is that whenever someone relatively Internet-famous like, say, Pat the NES Punk[1] (another friend of James and Co.), speaks out against the problems inherent in the game industry and game journalism, you now have assholes from Irredeemably Toxic Shithole falling all over themselves to be the first to claim shit like "This Guy Gets It" and such, as though he had come out and explicitly said "I support GamerGate" or some shit. Pat Contri is absolutely correct in what he said in those videos. That, however, does not mean that he by default also supports Irredeemably Toxic Shithole, despite dubious claims to the contrary by Irredeemably Toxic Shithole. Hell, I have said much the same things, but if you try to claim that I support Irredeemably Toxic Shithole as a result of that, I will fucking fight you.

But back to my original concern: I really, truly hope that Cinemassacre doesn't turn into yet another misguided supporter of Irredeemably Toxic Shithole based on its association with this AlphaOmegaSin guy. I mean, sure, they can have whoever the fuck they want on their site and in their videos, but that doesn't mean I have to watch it.

[1] - As an aside, that Ian Ferguson dude in that second link there is the one who really "gets it," in my opinion. He was already aptly describing Irredeemably Toxic Shithole even way back then, when it was only just starting to becoming A Thing™. Pat's trying to be more... diplomatic... I guess, which is fine, but that Ian guy is simply telling it like it is. Also, in that particular video, they're talking more specifically about the Quinnspiracy horseshit (which I've long since lost pretty much all interest in), rather than Irredeemably Toxic Shithole itself in general. That video was posted only a day after Adam Baldwin first used the hashtag #gamergate, after all. They do touch on it kind of obliquely, when Pat mentions "the fringe." Ian describes them more accurately, however, as Eron Gjoni's "personal army" (though they've long since grown way bigger than that, unfortunately, precisely because so many otherwise well-meaning people bought into the "actually, it's about ethics in games journalism" horse manure). To put it succinctly: Pat's right about video game journalism in general, whereas Ian is right about Irredeemably Toxic Shithole in particular. They're both right. (EDIT) Also note how so many of the comments under that video are going on about how that Ian guy is so wrong and "uninformed" and "indoctrinated" and whatever other bullshit. That's the typical responses from supporters of Irredeemably Toxic Shithole whenever anyone calls them on their bullshit, even though the guy was 100% correct in what he was saying. Also claiming that all of the threats made against Zoe Quinn were made by Zoe Quinn herself and her friends, and then citing goddamn Encyclopedia Dramatica of all things as "proof" of this. Go fucking figure. Seriously, the comments under that are so chock full of sad sack supporters of Irredeemably Toxic Shithole it's not even funny. (/EDIT)
kane_magus: (kanethumb1)
Similar to what I did with the Michael Bay TMNT movie, I have opted to read/watch reviews of Batman v Superman instead of seeing the movie myself.

So yeah.

All that stuff behind cut )

I truly don't feel like I am missing too awfully much by not seeing this movie.

I'll just leave you with what could've and should've been the movie about Batman and Superman, but wasn't, because it's just a fan-trailer made in 2004, and not an actual movie. Unlike "Batman v Superman," which is the movie we did get. Disappointingly.

kane_magus: (kanethumb1)


TakeDownAbuse.org

Apparently, the US Copyright Office opened up discussions about the DMCA and then didn't tell anyone about it. Now, there's a little over a day left to do so. My guess is that they were hoping that nobody would notice, and then they could do whatever the hell they wanted.

(EDIT) Oh, and just to be clear, you do not have to be a citizen of the USA in order to submit a comment on this stuff. (/EDIT)
kane_magus: (kanethumb1)


Here's another interesting video from a lawyer in response to the Nostalgia Critic Where's The Fair Use? video.
kane_magus: (kanethumb1)


As I said in my previous post on this subject, this shit right here is why I will never seriously use Youtube myself for anything at all. And at this point, even if they did fix the broken system at some nebulous point in the future, they've already allowed it to go on for far too long that I would ever trust them again.

Good on Doug Walker and everyone else who is fighting against this rampant horseshit, though. More power to them.
kane_magus: (kanethumb1)
Youtube embeds behind cut )

Bullshit like this is why I am not, have never been, and will never be interested in doing much of anything at all, ever, on Youtube.

Profile

kane_magus: (Default)
kane_magus

July 2025

S M T W T F S
   12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Page generated Jul. 1st, 2025 02:48 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios