Pat's actual "am I crazy?" thing around 6 minutes into the video was not all that crazy. Pat's "real" take near the end of the video, around 14 minutes in, was off the wall bonkers, and I'm glad Woolie told him he was "batshit." I think (or at least hope) he was just being facetious with the latter thing, though.
They only talk about it briefly in the video above, but despite what Woolie says there, it is most certainly not "the reality" that Stanley Kubrick's movie The Shining is "way, way better" than Stephen King's novel The Shining. "Kubrick's changes" absolutely did not make "a better product than the source material." It's certainly different, and good in its own way, but it's not better than the novel. The only thing that is "hilarious and kind of insane" is Woolie's dumbfuck claim to the contrary.
The movie The Shining by Stanley Kubrick is, however, better than King's own TV adaptation of his novel The Shining.
(I've only read the book version of Doctor Sleep, so I can't compare it to the 2019 movie, which I haven't seen. I've heard it makes changes to what was in the book, though. [For instance, in the book, the Overlook Hotel had burned down. In the movie... no, not so much.] In general, King is not averse to changes made in adaptations of his stuff, e.g. his love for the ending of the film version of The Mist, which King has claimed he wished he'd come up with it for the novella. He just really hated the changes Kubrick made in The Shining, and I don't blame him.)