kane_magus: (Default)
Seems that Dumbshit Trump is not a fan of thinly veiled potential calls for assassination if they're aimed at him, rather than when he himself is making the same toward his political opponents. How hypocritical of him.

Also, whenever James Comey is mentioned in the news, I feel obligated to refer back to the True Pundit Hoax.

Anyway, in conclusion, to hell forever with Donald Trump, as usual. Or in other terms: 8647. ¬_¬

Wow...

Jun. 9th, 2023 01:41 am
kane_magus: (Default)
Pat Robertson is dead and Trump has been federally indicted? I could say something banal like "It's like Christmas in June," except that I don't give much of a shit about Christmas even in the best of times, generally speaking, so instead I'll just say that these two pieces of news do not make me unhappy. Not unhappy at all. They don't necessarily make me happy, mind you, but definitely not even a little bit unhappy.

First learned of Pat Robertson's death via Wil Wheaton and of Trump's indictment via Seth Abramson, both when I happened to open my Feedly page, a few minutes prior to starting on this post.

Mr. Wheaton's story is dark as fuck. I like it. Quite a bit of "thorn-cocked Gulbuth The Rampant" energy, there. Honestly, I don't believe that hell is a thing that exists. I think that Pat Robertson has merely ceased to exist, except as inert matter and in the memories of living people, which, hopefully, will entirely fade away soon enough, as far as the world as a whole is concerned, at least. That said, I'm totally in favor of "fan" fiction and parody articles that place human shitstains like Pat Robertson in hell. I can't wait to read all the similar "fan" fiction that will be written once Donald Trump finally carks it. I might even write a bit of it myself when the time comes (hopefully sooner rather than later), who knows.

Speaking of Trump... meh... some of that Seth Abramson Twitter thread I linked to up there sounds kind of like equal parts hopeful/doom-saying/sensationalist "fan" fiction, too. Meh again. Part of me wants to say "This might be it... Trump might finally be about to go to prison... oh how I hope so..." but most of me just wants to say "Meh, Trump will slime his way out of this, too, the same way Trump has slimed his way out of all the other fucking consequences to his execrable actions." In any case, my breath is not a thing that I will be holding over this.

Also, assuming that Trump, despite everything, still somehow manages to win the GQP primary and runs in the general election in 2024, which still has an alarmingly high possibility of being a thing that happens, I will, of course, be voting against his stupid ass, same as I've voted against his stupid ass in every other election in which Trump has run and for which I have been eligible to vote. And if Trump somehow, someway, despite everything, against all the odds, manages to win the Presidency again in 2024... well... recall how I said that "America has officially shit the bed" after the last time Trump somehow managed to win? This would be ever so much worse.

Oh, and fuck Kevin McCarthy, Ron Desantis, Elon Musk, and all those other seething, deceitful dumbfucks right in their malign anuses with a necrotizing fasciitis-infested pine cone, too. One can even use the same pine cone for all of them. In fact, I would recommend it. It would probably turn out better that way.

(As this post started getting longer and longer, I thought about breaking it into two separate posts, one about the Pat Robertson thing and one about the Dumbshit Jizzstain Trump thing... but meh. Current time, as I'm about to hit the "post" button: 3:22am EDT.)
kane_magus: (Default)
Here's some appropriate music to set the mood.




So, basically, what I take away from all this is that this report by John Durham, a Republican appointed as a special counsel by Trump stan[1] William Barr to "investigate" the FBI investigation into the whole Trump/Russia thing, can pretty much be safely ignored as the partisan dogshit it was always destined to be. What a shock, I know. *eye roll* I mean, apparently, Durham's conclusion was essentially "While the FBI was free to investigate Trump, they totally shouldn't have investigated him so hard." From the very start, this was never intended to be favorable to the FBI or unfavorable toward Trump.

In any case, Trumpanzees are just going to use this as more "proof" that Trump/Russia is a "nothingburger." Though, to be fair, it pretty much is a nothingburger, at least in the sense that Trump is ever going to face even the tiniest of consequences for his myriad heinous crimes. *weary sigh*

(I was kind of waiting for a Seth Abramson thread on this, but apparently he just used it as opportunity to plug his books again. I mean, good on him and all, because more people need to read those books, but I was hoping for something a bit more immediately relevant than that. Unless he's saving that for his Substack thing. *shrug* Oh, and speaking of Seth Abramson and Trump and the FBI and all that shit, I will just use that as an excuse to leave this here, yet again.)

(EDIT)

Also this:

I don't know what has become of CNN lately. They seem to have gone from mostly dry and boring to actively bad and untrustworthy. Basically, they are becoming the "fake news" that Trump always said they were, but mostly because they seem to be becoming explicitly more pro-Trump. I guess they're taking that guy's desire for them to "be more like FOX News" to heart. As far as this concerns me, I guess if CNN is becoming worthless shit like Faux Noise, that just means that I'll be refraining from linking to CNN in the future and will be seeking out more legitimate sources of news for any given story.

(/EDIT)

(EDIT 2)

Okay, it's not Seth Abramson, but here is a thread on the subject of the Durham "report."

(And reading only a few of the replies to that thread on actual Twitter makes me glad that I no longer have an account on that blazing trashfire of a social media website.)

(/EDIT 2)

[1] - At the time, at least, though Barr seems to have become a little bit soured on Trump these days. Not that that matters at all, as it's a textbook case of far too little, far too late, as well as textbook cases of backpedaling and ass-covering. Barr still deserves to rot in prison alongside Trump and everyone else involved in Trump's criminal dumbfuckery.
kane_magus: (Default)
Yeah, this seemed like a big enough Event™ that I felt like looking up the Seth Abramson thread about it, because I knew there would be a Seth Abramson thread about it.

(Pre-post EDIT) Here is a Thread Reader page for the below thread, if you'd prefer to view it that way. For one thing, it preserves the images and article blurbs, which the below embeds do not. The only thing the Thread Reader page doesn't have is my own aside about the #TruePunditHoax. (/Pre-post EDIT)

Because the threading is all wonky at the moment on Twitter, I'm just going to individually embed all of his tweets here:

Behind a cut, of course. )

If all of this ends up with Trump evading justice yet again and, worse, somehow becoming POTUS yet again, all this will prove is that justice is well and truly dead forever in the United States and also that there are still far too many braindead wastes of oxygen in the American voting public if anyone at all votes for Trump in 2024. But even if the best case happens and Trump ends up not only not POTUS again in 2024 but also in prison for what would hopefully be the rest of his natural life, the fact remains that he's already pretty much irrevocably ruined the SCOTUS for at least the next several decades. This has already happened, and as far as I know there's not a damn thing anyone can do to fix that grievous mistake.
kane_magus: (Default)

"What are the top 25 SNES games? We discuss a game list curated by journalist Seth Abramson."



As always, lists like this are the opinion of whoever made the list (Seth Abramson, again, in this case) and nobody else. As such, Pat "throwing shade" (his words, not mine) for the list being "wrong" (my word, not his, but that's basically what he implied if not outright said) is kind of petty, as he (Pat) is not the arbiter/gatekeeper of that shit, any more than Seth Abramson or me or anyone else is. Basically, my enjoyment of this video was marred by Pat's constant "I don't think <insert game> should have been that high on the list" shit and his "well clearly these list-makers have only played the 'popular' games and don't know the full breadth of the library like me (even though there were several games on this very list that I myself knew nothing about) so their opinions are inferior" shit.

Additionally, to "throw shade" back at Pat, I've heard of all the games on the actual list, even if I haven't played all of them. The ones Pat called out as ones that he thought should have been on the list but weren't... not so much. And some of the ones on Pat's list that I have heard of and played, no... not top 25 for me. And I don't even have to have fucking played Tecmo Super Bowl to know that I wouldn't have put it anywhere near the top 25 on any list of SNES games, mainly because I don't give a shit about football games, no matter how "good" they are. See how my opinion, which obviously differs from Pat's, would inform how I'd rank things if I made a futile list like this? Yeah.

I absolutely disagree with both of their opinions about Castlevania IV, regardless of where it may have appeared on the list. Sure, Bloodlines is great, too, but Castlevania IV is one of my favorites. To say "it's not my favorite" is fine. To say "I don't like it" is fine. To say it "doesn't feel that much like Castlevania" is asinine.

And Ian calling Secret of Mana a "Zelda clone" is kind of ignorant and silly. *eye roll*

I mean, I still like these guys, and I agree with their opinions about 99% of the time otherwise, but sometimes they just get a little too hoity-toity for my tastes, such as here. And I don't even necessarily fully agree with Seth's list myself, either.

(I would've probably had Terranigma in my own such list somewhere, if I ever were to make one, but then, that game wasn't even released in North America, so it's not surprising to me that neither Seth nor Pat and Ian mentioned it at all.)
kane_magus: (Default)

"We discuss the top 25 NES games ranked, as compiled from journalist Seth Abramson. Do we agree with the list?"



I've got no real problems with the list, but then, same as last time, I haven't played a ton of NES games to be able to make such a list myself. I'd agree that either Super Mario Bros. 3 or The Legend of Zelda should be in the top spot, for sure, as that's kind of a no-brainer really.

I still just find it rather surreal to be thinking about Seth Abramson in a context of "video games" rather than a context of "exposing Donald Trump's bullshit six months to a year or more before anyone in the mainstream media even sniffs at it."
kane_magus: (Default)

"We discuss a list of the worst NES games, compiled by Seth Abramson. What do we agree and disagree with?"



I don't really have a dog in this race, as I've never played the vast majority of the games discussed here, and the only reason I've even heard of most of them is due to things like the Angry Video Game Nerd and such. I just thought it was interesting that Seth Abramson is apparently the one who made this list. I haven't been paying all that much attention to him with regards to political shit lately[1], but if Mr. Abramson has started talking about video games now, maybe I'll start paying attention again.

[1] - Not that I stopped agreeing with him as far as the politics stuff went, mind you. His was just one of the many other more politically inclined profiles that I culled from the list of those I followed, back when I started using Twitter again, mainly due to the fact that I just find the absurd asininity and visceral hatefulness of politics in general utterly exhausting nowadays.
kane_magus: (Default)
Yeah, this just feeds into my "not going to hold my breath on that" stance. As much as the world would be better off otherwise, Trump's probably not going to be charged with his crimes, and if he is charged, he's probably not going to be convicted. Because the world fucking sucks.

And, once again, while I think that Trump is, has been, and always will be a vile shithead, Bitch McConnell is, was, and will continue to be the far bigger threat to America. He's the one I really want gone forever. (EDIT, May 2025) Since Trump has been (somehow) reelected to SCROTUS IMPOTUS in 2024 and has spent the first part of his reign of terror in 2025 being a massive, massive piece of shit (to the point that even McConnell has, at times, criticized him), I have revised my assessment of Trump, in relation to McConnell. Trump is way worse. No doubt about that. It's just that Trump would not be President now if McConnell had done his fucking job properly back when Trump was impeached the first time, rather than treating it all like a big joke and acquitting him. (/EDIT, May 2025) But even Bitch McConnell, like Trump, is merely a symptom of the bigger problem, i.e. the far, far too large percentage of the population who stupidly, ignorantly, gullibly, hatefully, mistakenly believe that McConnell, and Trump, did and are doing a fine job.
kane_magus: (Default)
Surprising absolutely nobody who has been paying the least bit attention for the past few years now, William Barr has once again proven himself to be a good little Trump lackey. Maybe one of the best, even. Perhaps someday, in a perfect world, he would end up sharing a prison cell with his butt buddy Trump. However, given that Barr is not already in prison but is, instead, somehow, still the Attorney General (just like how Trump is, somehow, still the President), this proves that we don't live in a perfect world, or even a remotely good one.

(EDIT)

Even though I otherwise haven't been bothering lately, I felt that this issue was serious enough to look up a Seth Abramson Twitter thread on it. So, there it is. And here is a different, non-Seth thread, too. There are probably thousands more just like them on Twitter, but that would require looking at Twitter for more than five minutes outside of that, and that's not a thing I'm willing to subject myself to.

Anyway, yeah, everyone in smelling distance of Donald Trump deserves to rot, first, in prison and, second, in hell for the rest of eternity. Whatever it will take to make that come about needs to happen now. That is all.

(/EDIT)
kane_magus: (Default)

"In today's episode, Bernie Sanders.



"Or Joe Biden or whatever. Just send this video to your parents who have not voted yet."



"There was that Comey letter right before the election."

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/939432544008921088.html
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/939903988228608000.html
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/940037016619597829.html
kane_magus: (Default)

Okay. I'm once again reinstating my self-imposed (but long since abandoned) moratorium on reading, and, more importantly, ranting about political shit. At least, I'm going to try it for a while, anyway. Maybe a week, maybe two, maybe a month, hopefully longer.

The way I see it, I already know for a stone cold fact that I'm going to be voting for any and all Democrats come November. No amount of anti-Trump/anti-Trumpanzee news is going to somehow make me vote even harder against them. That's not a thing that is even possible at this point. As such, there's just no point in bothering with it. And no rant by me is going to change anyone's mind about Trump (especially since, given how curated my FB feed and f-list is, it's mostly just being seen by those who already agree with me, for the most part [or at least, I assume and hope that's the case... if not... I'm not sure I even want to know]). Lastly, nothing I say or share or "retweet" or whatever is going to magically remove Trump (and McConnell and Graham and Kavanaugh and... etc.) from office.

Mainly, this means no more Seth Abramson threads for a while. But also, no more other shit, either. Just today, I (re-)added NPR and BBC to my FB feed, but now I'm going to turn right around and take them back off again. That was probably the tipping point for this decision, in fact.

It probably won't make me happier, per se, to do this, but I think it'll at least maybe help a little with the all the headaches (both literal and figurative).

The only thing I won't be eschewing is Some More News by Cody Johnston. ­¬_¬
kane_magus: (Default)
As per usual, Donald Trump recently claimed that he has no idea who Lev Parnas is. This is what Trump says about anyone and everyone who has ever admitted to doing crimes with him.
kane_magus: (Default)
I wonder how many posts with the title "Another Seth Abramson thread" I'll have made by the time this whole Donald Jackass Trump shitshow is all over.

So yeah, the first time I read that hit piece on Slate a couple years ago was pretty much the last time I trusted Slate for anything.

Mr. Abramson links to the Slate hit piece himself at the end of his thread there. I'm not going to sully my FacebookDreamwidth page by posting the link here.

Real thread starts around here, by the way.

And yeah, it is ridiculous that all of these heinous, criminal motherfuckers aren't already in prison and haven't already been in prison for at least half a decade by this point, rather than acting as the legal team for a criminal buddy who is badly masquerading as a President of the United States of America.

(EDIT)

"So, Ben Matthis-Lilley, how do I feel about pegging John Dowd *exactly* correctly more than *two years* before his perfidy became evident to the public at large? I feel fantastic about it. Proud as hell. And I hope your breed of birdcage-liner 'journalism' dies—and soon."

I love it when Seth gets especially catty. It's almost never not fully deserved.

Really, this is only one of many, many times that Seth Abramson has been proven exactly right on something he was saying anywhere from six months to a year or two more before the mainstream media got more than a whiff of it. (And collecting and collating what "whiffs" there have been up to now has been Mr. Abramson's bread and butter for the past three-plus years now, which is why he has been and continues to be so knowledgeable on the subject of all of Trump's inane horseshit.)

And he even apologizes for spelling the asshole's name wrong.

(/EDIT)
kane_magus: (Default)
Full headline for the article here, because it wouldn't fit in the DW subject field: "'A Mob Hit': New Evidence Suggests Disturbing Scheme by Trump’s Ukraine Goons Against Marie Yovanovitch"

Basically, a bunch of Trump's lickspittles (with Trump's blessing) got together and planned out Bad Things™ to happen to a U.S. Ambassador, because she was, among other things, in the way of their quest to manufacture dirt about Joe Biden and his son in Ukraine.

Everything about the heinous catastrophe that is the Donald Trump presidential administration just keeps getting crazier and crazier.

See also this Seth Abramson Twitter thread.

And yet, no matter what egregiously disgusting news comes out about Trump, his Trumpublican buddies in the Senate are still going to just let him off scot-free with an acquittal. It is goddamned enraging. The sooner every Republican is voted out of power, from whatever offices they may hold high or low, the better off everyone will be (except maybe them, but fuck them).
kane_magus: (Default)
This, right here, is a huge part of the reason I completely abandoned the toxic cesspit that is Twitter.[1] This never happened to me personally, but I saw it happen enough times, to famous, semi-famous, and non-famous people alike, that it just plain disgusted me, and I wanted nothing more to do with it.

"we argued for hours"

And that was Mr. Abramson's big mistake.

Of course, you can't and shouldn't just let these fuckers get away with constantly libeling you, but if you try to confront them about it, they win. If you don't try to confront them about it, they still win. I don't know what is the solution to this conundrum.

Lawsuits, I guess? But those take time and money, and if you (especially if "you" are a semi-famous person like Seth Abramson with as big a following of haters and trolls as you have actual normal, human, non-shitstain followers) sued everyone that libeled you on Twitter, you'd be doing nothing else but that for literally the entire rest of your life, and you still wouldn't handle even a tiny fraction of them (and that's assuming you actually won all your cases, which is not a certainty).

[1] - Aside from getting back into reading Seth Abramson threads, of course, though those are usually just direct links from the ThreadReader site, and I rarely venture beyond that anymore, these days.
kane_magus: (Default)
(Just to note, I'm putting all this [copy/pasted from Facebook, with some formatting edits] here as much as a "note to self/for future perusal" [because there's no way in hell I'm reading all that shit right now, tonight] as I am for anyone else to read it if they want.)



I have to admit that I don't really understand a lot of what Mr. Abramson is saying in this thread. Also, up to now, he has been the only one I've ever seen talking about "metamodernism," and that only recently (though, presumably, it has been a thing for at least a decade?). So, yeah, I'm going to be checking out his source links (at the end of the thread) and elsewhere.

---

Oh... and all the sources he links to at the end of his thread are things that he, himself, wrote, so not sure how helpful they'll be, if they're anything like that thread there. >_>;

For reference, for those who don't care to visit Twitter:
Ten Basic Principles of Metamodernism
Five More Basic Principles of Metamodernism (VIDEOS)
Metamodernism: The Basics
On Metamodernism
Situating Zavarzadean Metamodernism, #1: What Is Metamodernism?

---

I guess it would help to be more knowledgeable about "modernism" and "postmodernism" and the difference between them as well, before trying to tackle "metamodernism," which I have to admit again is not a thing that I am, either.

---

From Wikipedia: "[Postmodernism] can be described as a reaction against scientific attempts to explain reality with objective certainty, recognizing that reality is constructed as the mind tries to understand its own personal circumstances."

"Criticisms of postmodernism are intellectually diverse, and include assertions that postmodernism promotes obscurantism[1], and is meaningless, adding nothing to analytical or empirical knowledge."

[1] - "Obscurantism is the practice of deliberately presenting information in an imprecise and recondite manner, often designed to forestall further inquiry and understanding."

Well... that, at least in part, explains why "postmodernism" is being associated with Trump supporters and 4channers and FOX News contributors and the like, I guess. >_>

---

And it may, all of it, simply be horseshit of the most pretentious sort. I don't know, but I'm potentially willing to entertain that verdict as well, if it comes down to that. ­¬_¬

---

It's been a while since I did a Wiki Walk on actual Wikipedia... >_>; For years, most of the ones I've done have been on TVTropes.

---

Tangentially related Youtube embeds behind cut )
kane_magus: (Default)
This is an example of Faux Noise lies literally getting innocent people killed.
kane_magus: (Default)
Bitch McConnell has been in politics for far longer than Trump has. McConnell is much better at being a slimy shitheel than Trump is. (Trump is too brash and out-in-the-open with his shitheel tendencies, which, in many ways, makes him less dangerous and less of an overall threat than McConnell is.) McConnell is, for all intents and purposes, the only real reason Trump is still in office now. Trump has only ever been nothing more than a useful tool to McConnell. I've had no use for McConnell ever since he said his "number one priority is making sure president Obama’s a one-term president." He's just been proving himself to be a bigger and bigger asshat ever since.

Profile

kane_magus: (Default)
kane_magus

May 2025

S M T W T F S
     1 2 3
4 5 678 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 1617
18 19 20212223 24
2526 27 2829 30 31

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Page generated Jun. 1st, 2025 08:59 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios