kane_magus: (Default)
I don't know if it's a Windows 10 thing or a my-specific-computer thing or what, but I've noticed that ever since I installed Windows 10 however many months ago that was, every program (or app or whatever the hell you call them these days) I open, the first time I open them after a boot, they invariably take something in the vicinity of three to five times to fully start, be it a game or a word processor or Internet browser or whatever. This is not something that occurred back when I was still running Windows 7, at least as far as I recall now. It's gotten to the point now to where I just automatically close a thing down as soon as it gets to the main menu (if it's a game) the first time I launch it, because A) I know that on all subsequent launches, it will start normally until I boot the computer again, and B) I'm actually not sure if this long-load-on-first-launch thing affects only the initial loading or if it will run more slowly the whole time on the first run. Checking Google for an attempt at more info on this issue has led to zilch for me so far.
kane_magus: (Default)
Sometimes I loathe living in NC. -_-

I just sent the following message to Roy Cooper via the governor.nc.gov site:

"Governor Cooper, I would like to urge you as strongly as I can to *NOT* listen to or give in to the misguided protesters who are calling for you to prematurely end the Stay-At-Home order dealing with the COVID-19 crisis. If anything, the Stay-At-Home order should probably be extended further. These methods to mitigate the virus are working, and too many people are taking this as evidence that said methods were an overreaction, rather than evidence that the methods work."

I am not expecting a response from Gov. Cooper, as I did not request one, but whatever the case, I expect that Roy Cooper will have more sense than someone like, say, Richard Burr or Thom Tillis or Mark Walker, all of whom I have also sent messages to in the past and from whom I received, at best, lackluster responses (at worst, enragingly asinine, Trump-asshole-sucking responses).

---

I hope that every single solitary one of these stupid dumbfucks who are gathering to protest the social distancing and stay-at-home orders, in NC or elsewhere, is infected with COVID-19. And, no, I don't give a single flying shit if that's "a mean thing to say."

(EDIT)

Another post I just saw shared by [livejournal.com profile] rabbitucker (as was the article above) via FB from a page called "Keep NC closed," which consisted solely of the following meme image:

Meme image behind cut )

I don't normally do the whole meme thing, because 99.9999% of the time, it's just asinine dumbshit (and, in fact, I usually immediately block whatever pages memes are shared from [if not the ones doing the sharing]), but this one was timely and relevant, more so than usual.

(/EDIT)
kane_magus: (Default)
My Time at Portia seems very similar to Stardew Valley but with 3D models instead of 2D sprites, more focused on building/crafting than on farming, and with voice acting. Also, so far at least, I haven't felt nearly as overwhelmed playing MTaP as I did the several times I've tried to get into SV.

Also, My Time at Portia is the third game I've played recently that lets you pick up and store animal poop in your inventory (an "honor" shared with No Man's Sky and The Sims 4).
kane_magus: (Default)
(Fak)e-sports are not sports, and should not be treated as such. (But then, I don't consider real life NASCAR to be a sport either, so... *shrug*)

That said, dude was getting paid to play a video game (as asinine as that is), and then he stopped playing that video game, therefore he shouldn't be paid anymore. Though I guess it was more the fact that he was continuing to be an asshole after the fact that lost him his sponsor?

Story found via Penny Arcade.

(EDIT)

Outside of maybe Gran Turismo (and that only because it came with my PS2), the only racing games I've played have been stuff like Burnout or Mario Kart or RC Pro AM (or Outrun and Hang-on in Yakuza 0).

Oh, wait, no, I did play a "real" NASCAR game at one point in my youth. The vast majority of the time spent playing this game was used to turn around and drive in the wrong direction, because the game had "realistic" (i.e. not at all realistic, in any way shape or form) car damage, and it was fun to watch parts fly when I'd intentionally have head-on collisions with the on-coming NPC racers. This guy here knows what I'm talking about.

---

Hard Drivin' was pretty fun in the arcade for its time, too.

---

And this whole thing is yet another example of why I think some schmo running a company's Twitter account pretending like they are THE disembodied personification of that company as a whole is pretty damned asinine, as well. It's just some asshole on Twitter, little different than every other asshole on Twitter.

---

Also, this reminds me once again why I avoid the <can't think of anything bad enough that isn't more of an insult to that thing to compare it to Twitter than it is an insult to Twitter> that is Twitter.

Wait, wait I got one: Also, this reminds me once again why I avoid the Donald Trump that is Twitter.

(/EDIT)
kane_magus: (Default)
Oh, right, I'd forgotten why I quit playing The Sims Medieval all those years ago and never bothered trying it again, until now. It's a bug-ridden roach motel of a game. I was hoping that maybe the "Special Edition" on Origin would have had some of the issues maybe, you know, fixed, but no dice. Obviously, EA doesn't roll like that, dawg. And unlike the mainline Sims games, there are hardly any fanmade bugfix mods, either, and none for the game-breaking issues I was having.
kane_magus: (Default)
This is two mornings in a row now that I have been awakened by what apparently were dreams in which I heard someone yelling my name, even though nobody is here (and there were no messages on the answering machine to potentially explain it either, if it had been a real life occurrence). Even more annoying today in that I thought it was my sister with whom I live, so I got up and went to ask her if she'd yelled for me, only to find that she isn't even here at all, which is surprising given that it is Saturday. Apparently, she's gone to work.

Anyway, this sucks and I really hope it doesn't become a regular or even semi-regular thing.

(EDIT) Later dreams with this theme have added the sound of someone knocking on my bedroom door, instead of or in addition to the calling of my name. It well and truly sucks ass. (/EDIT)
kane_magus: (Default)


Rather than ranting at length about the perpetually ongoing asshattery of Dumbshit Jackass Trump that prompted the above embedded political ad which has President Dumpass all in an infantile tizzy, I will instead just copy/paste the words of Wil Wheaton, taken from his post on Facebook in which he does all the ranting for me:



Shitler and his enablers are threatening to have the FCC *revoke the license* of any broadcaster who airs this ad.

Be a real shame if literally everyone in America saw what they're trying so hard to deny ever happened, and recognized this undeniable truth: America's intelligence and public health officials told Trump all of this would happen, and Trump ignored them. Then he straight up lied about the risks facing America and the world, and then he lied about lying.

Trump knew, he just didn't care, because this is a fundamental truth about Republicans like Trump: They don't care about people and their quality of life. They _only_ care about accumulating money and power for themselves and their allies. They _do not_ want government to work to protect and care for the basic human rights of anyone, including their own voters. It's unsurprising that, with these fuckers in charge, we find ourselves leading the world in COVID-19 cases.

Trump and his cultists are lying about his callousness, dismissal of experts, and refusal to take the most deadly and serious pandemic in over 100 years seriously.

For those of us who remember "Bin Ladin determined to strike in the US", this feels a lot like history repeating itself. We need to do our best to make sure they don't get away with claiming, like Bush and his administration claimed, that "nobody could have seen this coming."

Experts kept begging Trump and the grifters in his administration to pay attention and prepare, and they couldn't be bothered. That's the truth. The truth is that Trump didn't care about you, he didn't care about your family. He DOESN'T care about anyone but himself, his wealth and his power.

Do not let them get away with misleading the public now, and in the future, about how utterly and completely they failed to prepare America for this crisis.

#FuckTrump
kane_magus: (Default)
Here is an article I saw posted to FB by [personal profile] dmjewelle, and below is my copy/pasted response, both in a comment reply to her post and in my own posting to FB of the same article (slightly edited for html formatting):



When you're dealing with a moron who does things like cross out "corona" and replace it with "Chinese" in his notes for a speech about the coronavirus, there's really not much anyone can do besides pick up the pieces afterward, when said moron has finished bulling (or bullshitting) his way through the china shop. (No offense intended toward actual bulls, of course, since a literal angry bull would be a better President than this moron.)

I wish someone would jump up and push him away from the microphone whenever he starts to go off on one of his lying spiels. But then, if you were going to do that, you'd need to hire a defensive line from a professional football team to just tackle him away from microphones in general, in perpetuity, because the moron never does anything but lie whenever he gets near one, regardless of whatever the topic at hand may be.

The real problem is that there are far too few people in Washington like Fauci who even talk about doing things like pushing him away from microphones when he lies (let alone actually doing it), and far too many (e.g. pretty much every Republican in Congress) who actively encourage his stupid ass.
kane_magus: (Default)
What a goddamned moron. Every day that this man remains the President of the United States is a sad day for the country and the world.

Also, on a related topic, it is amazing how ridiculously not photogenic the man is.

(Via [livejournal.com profile] rabbitucker via Facebook.)
kane_magus: (Default)
Link to an article.

And now, I will copy/paste here, with minor edits for html formatting, yet another anti-Trump rant from Facebook, in response to the above:



Behind cut )
kane_magus: (Default)
(Mostly copy/pasted from FB, but with some additions [beyond just the hypertext] that weren't in the original FB post.)

(Also, "RPG games" is kind of fingernails-on-chalkboard to me, but... meh.)

Not going to do a whole huge-mini-review of each game on the list this time, but of these, the ones that I've played (none yet to completion except for Diablo, which is only mentioned), are: Nox, Grim Dawn, Transistor, Depths of Peril (I own Din's Curse, but not yet Din's Legacy, and have played neither, and hadn't heard of Zombasite at all prior to this article), Victor Vran (didn't like it much), Titan Quest, and Sacred Gold. So... most of them, really.

The reason I won't be writing a huge-mini-review for each of them is because... well, there's really not a whole lot of difference between them. They could have also included Divine Divinity (completed as a mage) or Path of Exile (not on GOG likely due to it being online-only, which is probably why they didn't mention it) or Torchlight (completed as a vanquisher) or Dungeon Siege (really don't know why this one isn't on GOG, but that's probably why they didn't mention it), among many others. And, again, still, there's really not all that much difference between any of them. You're looking down at an unchanging angle at your hero (maybe some of the later games give you a bit more camera control), you're fighting hundreds of monsters and, later, stronger variations of the same palette-swapped monsters, you typically either choose a class at the start from the standard warrior/mage/rogue types (or whatever offbeat name a particular game decides to rename them to) or you start as a blank slate and build your character (mostly) toward one of these as you go along, you find tons of leveled, multi-color-labelled, sometimes unique equipment and other loot, and you usually have a hub location to which you return to sell or store that loot. And... that basically sums up those games, in a nutshell. Any differences are usually cosmetic, such as storylines or graphics or music, and don't really affect the gameplay itself.

I'm not trying to rag on these games, because of the ones I've played I've usually liked a lot (except for Victor Vran, which I really didn't get into much, the one time I tried it, and that may just have been due more to my mood at the time than the game itself). I even liked the free-to-play Path of Exile... at least for the 80-something minutes I tried to play it singleplayer, before I got randomly disconnected from the always-online server (even for singleplayer), which booted me out of the game, and then I never touched it again.

I guess if I had to pick favorites, I'd go with Diablo/Diablo II (never touched and likely will never touch Diablo III, due to it also being always-online, and not free-to-play... also Diablo II is on neither GOG nor Steam, for whatever asinine reasons), Torchlight/Torchlight II (though I've yet to finish the second one), and Grim Dawn (made it almost to the end, but then just... stopped playing it, for whatever reasons... likely because right when I was almost finished, they announced an upcoming DLC or whatever, and I decided to wait for that, then never bought it, then never went back to the original game).
kane_magus: (Default)
If Bernie Sanders cannot stop Bernie Sanders supporters from being awful, then why should I believe that Bernie Sanders would be a good leader as President? If he can't even keep the people that like him from being douchenozzles, how can he be expected of having a chance in hell of dealing with people that don't like him? That's one of the reasons I don't like the idea of Sanders as the nominee or as President. He doesn't seem to care about the reputation his supporters have, which reflects badly on him.

I'd say it's similar to Trump, except that Trump actively encourages his supporters to be awful, disgusting people, because Trump himself is an awful, disgusting person. I have to assume the Sanders does not want his supporters to be awful, disgusting people. If it turns out that he doesn't care or is, like Trump, actually encouraging people to be terrible, then that's all the more reason he probably shouldn't be the Democratic nominee.

Also, it's yet another reason among countless reasons why Facebook continues to be shit.

(Same disclaimer as always: I will vote for Sanders over Trump, if he is the nominee, but he, like Biden, is not my first choice.)

(Article found via [livejournal.com profile] rabbitucker on FB.)
kane_magus: (Default)
Of the games in this list, I've only played Stardew Valley, Craft the World, and Banished, so I'll talk a bit about those.

Lots of text )

So, yeah. Those are my mini(-ish) reviews for those three games.

And if I were making a list like this myself, I'd have probably added Slime Rancher and maybe Gnomoria, as well. (I won't go into writing big reviews for those, but they're pretty good, too.)
kane_magus: (Default)

Okay. I'm once again reinstating my self-imposed (but long since abandoned) moratorium on reading, and, more importantly, ranting about political shit. At least, I'm going to try it for a while, anyway. Maybe a week, maybe two, maybe a month, hopefully longer.

The way I see it, I already know for a stone cold fact that I'm going to be voting for any and all Democrats come November. No amount of anti-Trump/anti-Trumpanzee news is going to somehow make me vote even harder against them. That's not a thing that is even possible at this point. As such, there's just no point in bothering with it. And no rant by me is going to change anyone's mind about Trump (especially since, given how curated my FB feed and f-list is, it's mostly just being seen by those who already agree with me, for the most part [or at least, I assume and hope that's the case... if not... I'm not sure I even want to know]). Lastly, nothing I say or share or "retweet" or whatever is going to magically remove Trump (and McConnell and Graham and Kavanaugh and... etc.) from office.

Mainly, this means no more Seth Abramson threads for a while. But also, no more other shit, either. Just today, I (re-)added NPR and BBC to my FB feed, but now I'm going to turn right around and take them back off again. That was probably the tipping point for this decision, in fact.

It probably won't make me happier, per se, to do this, but I think it'll at least maybe help a little with the all the headaches (both literal and figurative).

The only thing I won't be eschewing is Some More News by Cody Johnston. ­¬_¬
kane_magus: (Default)
I wonder how many posts with the title "Another Seth Abramson thread" I'll have made by the time this whole Donald Jackass Trump shitshow is all over.

So yeah, the first time I read that hit piece on Slate a couple years ago was pretty much the last time I trusted Slate for anything.

Mr. Abramson links to the Slate hit piece himself at the end of his thread there. I'm not going to sully my FacebookDreamwidth page by posting the link here.

Real thread starts around here, by the way.

And yeah, it is ridiculous that all of these heinous, criminal motherfuckers aren't already in prison and haven't already been in prison for at least half a decade by this point, rather than acting as the legal team for a criminal buddy who is badly masquerading as a President of the United States of America.

(EDIT)

"So, Ben Matthis-Lilley, how do I feel about pegging John Dowd *exactly* correctly more than *two years* before his perfidy became evident to the public at large? I feel fantastic about it. Proud as hell. And I hope your breed of birdcage-liner 'journalism' dies—and soon."

I love it when Seth gets especially catty. It's almost never not fully deserved.

Really, this is only one of many, many times that Seth Abramson has been proven exactly right on something he was saying anywhere from six months to a year or two more before the mainstream media got more than a whiff of it. (And collecting and collating what "whiffs" there have been up to now has been Mr. Abramson's bread and butter for the past three-plus years now, which is why he has been and continues to be so knowledgeable on the subject of all of Trump's inane horseshit.)

And he even apologizes for spelling the asshole's name wrong.

(/EDIT)
kane_magus: (Default)
Might Donald Trump very well be the first President of the United States of America to be impeached more than once?

Here's my question though: with all this hullabaloo about impeaching Trump, I want to know what, if anything, can be done about the obvious malfeasance of Mitch McConnell[1]? Can he be impeached as well? Or whatever equivalent process may exist (or may not exist, and if not, can it be brought into existence)? Is there anything, within the law, that Pelosi (or anyone else) can do about this?

Trump's impeachment needs to result in Trump being removed from office. This is an objective fact. Mitch McConnell[1] is standing in the way of this. Mitch McConnell[1] intends to subvert this and make sure it does not come to pass. This is also an objective fact. Mitch McConnell[1] needs to be punished and removed from office for his refusal to punish and remove Trump from office. Mitch McConnell[1] needs to be held accountable for his blatant complicity with Trump and Trump's crimes. How one goes about removing Mitch McConnell[1] from office, however, is what I don't know. Or if there is no legitimate process to accomplish that, that's even worse...

"Vote him out" is about the only legitimate process I can think of, but that takes time (far too much, given the situation) and, as seen by the fact that Mitch McConnell[1] is even still in office at all at this point, despite all of his prior (pre-Trump, even) brazen malfeasance, it just goes to show that "vote him out" is not all that good of a solution on which to bank everything, because he very well might not be voted out in November, despite how terrible of a Senator and how horrible of a human being he is, all due to his constituents who keep right on voting for him apparently being blithering imbeciles.

[1] - And a lot of others in the Senate, of course, but McConnell is the Majority Leader for the Trumpublicans and is effectively in charge of the Senate, so let's just start with and focus on him now.
kane_magus: (Default)
This, right here, is a huge part of the reason I completely abandoned the toxic cesspit that is Twitter.[1] This never happened to me personally, but I saw it happen enough times, to famous, semi-famous, and non-famous people alike, that it just plain disgusted me, and I wanted nothing more to do with it.

"we argued for hours"

And that was Mr. Abramson's big mistake.

Of course, you can't and shouldn't just let these fuckers get away with constantly libeling you, but if you try to confront them about it, they win. If you don't try to confront them about it, they still win. I don't know what is the solution to this conundrum.

Lawsuits, I guess? But those take time and money, and if you (especially if "you" are a semi-famous person like Seth Abramson with as big a following of haters and trolls as you have actual normal, human, non-shitstain followers) sued everyone that libeled you on Twitter, you'd be doing nothing else but that for literally the entire rest of your life, and you still wouldn't handle even a tiny fraction of them (and that's assuming you actually won all your cases, which is not a certainty).

[1] - Aside from getting back into reading Seth Abramson threads, of course, though those are usually just direct links from the ThreadReader site, and I rarely venture beyond that anymore, these days.
kane_magus: (Default)
(Just to note, I'm putting all this [copy/pasted from Facebook, with some formatting edits] here as much as a "note to self/for future perusal" [because there's no way in hell I'm reading all that shit right now, tonight] as I am for anyone else to read it if they want.)



I have to admit that I don't really understand a lot of what Mr. Abramson is saying in this thread. Also, up to now, he has been the only one I've ever seen talking about "metamodernism," and that only recently (though, presumably, it has been a thing for at least a decade?). So, yeah, I'm going to be checking out his source links (at the end of the thread) and elsewhere.

---

Oh... and all the sources he links to at the end of his thread are things that he, himself, wrote, so not sure how helpful they'll be, if they're anything like that thread there. >_>;

For reference, for those who don't care to visit Twitter:
Ten Basic Principles of Metamodernism
Five More Basic Principles of Metamodernism (VIDEOS)
Metamodernism: The Basics
On Metamodernism
Situating Zavarzadean Metamodernism, #1: What Is Metamodernism?

---

I guess it would help to be more knowledgeable about "modernism" and "postmodernism" and the difference between them as well, before trying to tackle "metamodernism," which I have to admit again is not a thing that I am, either.

---

From Wikipedia: "[Postmodernism] can be described as a reaction against scientific attempts to explain reality with objective certainty, recognizing that reality is constructed as the mind tries to understand its own personal circumstances."

"Criticisms of postmodernism are intellectually diverse, and include assertions that postmodernism promotes obscurantism[1], and is meaningless, adding nothing to analytical or empirical knowledge."

[1] - "Obscurantism is the practice of deliberately presenting information in an imprecise and recondite manner, often designed to forestall further inquiry and understanding."

Well... that, at least in part, explains why "postmodernism" is being associated with Trump supporters and 4channers and FOX News contributors and the like, I guess. >_>

---

And it may, all of it, simply be horseshit of the most pretentious sort. I don't know, but I'm potentially willing to entertain that verdict as well, if it comes down to that. ­¬_¬

---

It's been a while since I did a Wiki Walk on actual Wikipedia... >_>; For years, most of the ones I've done have been on TVTropes.

---

Tangentially related Youtube embeds behind cut )
kane_magus: (Default)
Bitch McConnell has been in politics for far longer than Trump has. McConnell is much better at being a slimy shitheel than Trump is. (Trump is too brash and out-in-the-open with his shitheel tendencies, which, in many ways, makes him less dangerous and less of an overall threat than McConnell is.) McConnell is, for all intents and purposes, the only real reason Trump is still in office now. Trump has only ever been nothing more than a useful tool to McConnell. I've had no use for McConnell ever since he said his "number one priority is making sure president Obama’s a one-term president." He's just been proving himself to be a bigger and bigger asshat ever since.
kane_magus: (Default)
Article found via Seth Abramson (and, yes, conservatives are raging hypocrites, most of the time, despite Seth's hemming and hawing on the topic there).

So, basically, that Trumpanzee kid got paid big bucks for being an asshat. He probably didn't get all of the $800,000,000 he wanted, but if he got even just a penny, that was a penny too much.

Profile

kane_magus: (Default)
kane_magus

April 2025

S M T W T F S
   1 2 345
6 7 8 910 1112
13 14 15 16 1718 19
20 21 2223242526
27282930   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Page generated Apr. 23rd, 2025 01:46 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios