"What foundational internet words have to do with 4chan."
I would say something like "why does everything on the Internet always seem to originate (or, at least, is accused of originating) on 4chan?" However, in this particular case, it tracks. (And, yeah, as one of the comments pointed out, the term "troll" did not fucking originate from 4chan.)
Blessedly, around 99% of the terms used in this article were and still are gobbledygook to me, because I don't swim in the pools where such things have ostensibly become "normalized" (e.g. Tiktok), and the few that weren't, like "blackpilled" or whatever, just inspire hard eye rolls and heavy, weary sighs.
4chan has never been about anything but "teh lulz," and it will never not be about anything but "teh lulz." I'm sure they have a field day over there every time some "scholarly" article (or, in this case, a book shill thinly disguised as a scholarly article) like this about their bullshit hits the Internet. I mean, don't get me wrong, it is an interesting article (I wouldn't have posted a link to it here if I didn't think that), but... it's still an article about 4chan bullshit, all the same. (Though it's not so interesting that I have any intention to buy this guy's book.)
Also, people are writing entire books of their own in the comments of this article, some of which are about as interesting as the article itself.
I would say something like "why does everything on the Internet always seem to originate (or, at least, is accused of originating) on 4chan?" However, in this particular case, it tracks. (And, yeah, as one of the comments pointed out, the term "troll" did not fucking originate from 4chan.)
Blessedly, around 99% of the terms used in this article were and still are gobbledygook to me, because I don't swim in the pools where such things have ostensibly become "normalized" (e.g. Tiktok), and the few that weren't, like "blackpilled" or whatever, just inspire hard eye rolls and heavy, weary sighs.
4chan has never been about anything but "teh lulz," and it will never not be about anything but "teh lulz." I'm sure they have a field day over there every time some "scholarly" article (or, in this case, a book shill thinly disguised as a scholarly article) like this about their bullshit hits the Internet. I mean, don't get me wrong, it is an interesting article (I wouldn't have posted a link to it here if I didn't think that), but... it's still an article about 4chan bullshit, all the same. (Though it's not so interesting that I have any intention to buy this guy's book.)
Also, people are writing entire books of their own in the comments of this article, some of which are about as interesting as the article itself.
